From: Tobias Platen <trisquel@platen-software.de>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Meltdown / Spectre
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:46:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54a2c765-e064-15ab-345c-da8b0f755ab4@platen-software.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <315934ac-8ea6-5728-87a3-26cc59033220@tobias.gr>
On 09.01.2018 22:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Katherine,
>
> Not really an answer to your question, I'm afraid. Just some thoughts I
> had after hitting ‘Send’ on my previous non-answer.
>
> Katherine Cox-Buday wrote on 09/01/18 at 21:13:
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
>>> [...] how do we square not recommending proprietary globs like this
>>> in official channels with giving users all knowledge required to
>>> decide for themselves?
>>
>> Yes, this exactly.
>>
>> It's a unique (hm, is it?) situation pitting the ideals of copyleft
>
> I don't think it's unique per se, but it is of another degree entirely
> than, for example, asking users to buy a €15 RYF-certified wireless card
> instead of pushing proprietary firmware to the one they already have.[0]
>
> The rationale there being that freedom is worth the price, and
> (implicitly but importantly) that this price is affordable for anyone
> who values their freedom and owns a computer to begin with.
>
> I think that's reasonable.
>
>> against the welfare of users. If an opaque microcode is required to
>> successfully mitigate these bugs, what is the moral stance to take> I
>> don't have an answer and that's why I'm asking here :)
>
> Logically, it's perfectly sound to extrapolate the above policy to CPUs
> and entire systems. I'm half surprised someone hasn't done so yet: buy a
> Free(er) system, and you're arguably much better off than with even a
> patched non-Free one. And you're voting with your wallet. We all win!
The Talos II is a free-er system. And its processor (the POWER9) does
not seem to be affected by Meltdown/Sprectre [1].
[1] https://mobile.twitter.com/RaptorCompSys?p=s
>
> Morally, at least in the short-to-medium term, I'm not convinced.
> The smell of privilege becomes hard to ignore with the costs and other
> assumptions involved.
>
> Like you, I'm very curious to know what others think.
>
> * * *
>
> Note: despite my musing above, I don't *actually* expect GNU Guix to
> start shipping or even recommending proprietary software, including
> microcode. It opens cans of worms and then the worms get everywhere.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
>
> [0]: I'll not address the question of whether a device with proprietary
> firmware that you can or must update is more or less free than a device
> with proprietary firmware that you can't.
>
The Free Software Foundation treats programs stored in ROM as hardware,
this is documented in [2] and [3].
[2] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html
[3] https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/free-bios.html
Tobias Platem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-06 13:20 What do Meltdown and Spectre mean for libreboot x200 user? Alex Vong
2018-01-06 17:23 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-06 17:43 ` Meltdown / Spectre Leo Famulari
2018-01-06 20:15 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-07 6:38 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-07 21:29 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-09 21:39 ` Alex Vong
2018-01-10 4:59 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-16 10:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-19 22:06 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-20 0:17 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-21 16:26 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-24 14:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-24 16:19 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-26 22:05 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-27 16:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-10 15:00 ` ng0
2018-01-08 10:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-10 5:27 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-07 2:44 ` Chris Marusich
2018-01-08 17:22 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2018-01-08 18:26 ` Marius Bakke
2018-01-08 21:51 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018-01-08 22:01 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018-01-09 20:13 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2018-01-09 21:18 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018-01-10 5:26 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-11 19:45 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2018-01-11 21:49 ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2018-01-10 10:46 ` Tobias Platen [this message]
2018-01-10 17:20 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-10 6:43 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2018-01-10 18:41 ` Kei Kebreau
2018-01-16 3:58 ` Chris Marusich
2018-01-17 19:20 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-01-14 15:11 ` Alex Vong
2018-01-09 23:10 ` Mark H Weaver
2018-01-10 5:04 ` Leo Famulari
2018-01-16 11:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-17 2:38 ` Mike Gerwitz
2018-01-17 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-01-10 9:36 ` Chris Marusich
2018-01-10 11:49 ` Adonay Felipe Nogueira
2018-01-10 12:35 ` Tobias Platen
2018-01-10 14:04 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-01-12 0:25 ` Marius Bakke
2018-01-15 8:07 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-01-16 3:08 ` Mike Gerwitz
2018-01-16 10:04 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-01-12 7:39 ` Chris Marusich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54a2c765-e064-15ab-345c-da8b0f755ab4@platen-software.de \
--to=trisquel@platen-software.de \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).