unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries
@ 2014-10-30 12:45 Andreas Enge
  2014-11-02 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2014-10-30 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel

Hello,

should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output
path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH?

In texlive I see lines such as
patch-shebang: ./texmf-dist/tex/luatex/lualibs/lualibs-compat.lua: warning: no binary for interpreter `texlua' found in $PATH

The file starts with 
#!/usr/bin/env texlua
and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlua is
a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex).

Andreas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries
  2014-10-30 12:45 Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries Andreas Enge
@ 2014-11-02 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
  2014-11-02 17:48   ` Andreas Enge
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-11-02 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output
> path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH?

It already does.

> In texlive I see lines such as
> patch-shebang: ./texmf-dist/tex/luatex/lualibs/lualibs-compat.lua: warning: no binary for interpreter `texlua' found in $PATH

(And the mention of $PATH in this message is misleading.)

> The file starts with 
> #!/usr/bin/env texlua
> and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlua is
> a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex).

Could it be that the symlink doesn’t exist yet at the time the
‘patch-shebangs’ phase runs?

HTH,
Ludo’.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries
  2014-11-02 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2014-11-02 17:48   ` Andreas Enge
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2014-11-02 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel

On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 05:54:09PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> > should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output
> > path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH?
> It already does.

Hm.

> > The file starts with 
> > #!/usr/bin/env texlua
> > and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlua is
> > a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex).
> Could it be that the symlink doesn’t exist yet at the time the
> ‘patch-shebangs’ phase runs?

I think it already exists; the only thing between patch-shebangs and strip is
             (setenv "PATH" (string-append (getenv "PATH") ":" out "/bin"))
             (system* "updmap-sys" "--nohash" "--syncwithtrees")
             (system* "mktexlsr")
             (system* "fmtutil-sys" "--all")))

Andreas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-02 17:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-30 12:45 Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries Andreas Enge
2014-11-02 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-11-02 17:48   ` Andreas Enge

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).