bug#40549: More usability issues:

[zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 22:19, Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch> wrote:

> They are expected to always be equivalent. It would not be logical to have the
> short one as an alias if they are not equivalent.

I agree.
Note that you cannot have short-name with optional argument or you
have to break a rule; see below.


> > > You asked for an example;  see `git commit -S`. From the manpage:
> > >    -S[<keyid>], --gpg-sign[=<keyid>]
> >
> > Thank you for the example.   Let me show you that it raises an issue
> > too because it is not so "simple". :-)
>
> Easier example then: from the 'ls(1)' manpage:
>   -I, --ignore=PATTERN

No. `ls -I -l` is not doing the right behaviour, i.e., the flag '-l'
is not applied.
PATTERN is not optional.


> seems git is trying to be smart.

Git resolves the ambiguity by removing the form '-S keyid'.
Other said,
(1) '-Skeyid' uses keyid as argument
(2) '-S keyid' fails as I showed you.
(3) '-S' fallbacks to the default (see .gitconfig)

Back to Guix, using the same strategy means:

(1)  guix package -d8 -p /path/to/profile
(2)  guix package -d 8 -p /path/to/profile # fails
(3)  guix pacakge -d -p /path/to/profile # delete all the generations
except the current one

The three cases cannot all works.  You have to choose two cases.
Currently Guix uses (1) and (2); and (3) fails.   Git uses (1) and
(3); and (2) fails.

You have right by remarking that the "git-way" seems more consistent
when flipping the options.  However they are less consistent in regard
with option requiring one argument.

 git commit -S4417B7 -m 'init'

I do not have a strong opinion on the topic.  Even if I am often
annoyed by "guix package -I -p /path/to/profile".


> The point is not to reinvent the wheel that have been invented so many
> times... A command line parser is a known thing that you can, and should,
> mirror how others do things.

Are you aware of the wheel? :-)

https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-37/srfi-37.html
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Argument-Syntax.html
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/xbd_chap12.html#tag_12_02


> Even 'ls' uses optional short arguments (--ignore). So I'm not sure I agree
> with your line of reasoning.

No, the argument of '--ignore' is not optional.  At least with the GNU
version from coreutils 8.30.
Note the options with optional argument (--color and --hyperlink) do
not have a short-name form.


> Doing;
>   ls -I -v
> clearly understands that '-v' is not to be used as an optional argument.
> The reason, as far as I can tell, is that it does not fit as another argument.

You have wrong.  Compare

   ls -I -l
   ls -l -I
   ls -I '' -l


Because Guix uses SRFI-37 to parse command-line arguments and this
will not change, IMHO, the question asked on guile-devel is the one
explained above about the 3 cases.

All the best,
simon