From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:49:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:56:38 +0200")
Hello,
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:
> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
[...]
>> I think what needs to be done is the following:
>>
>> (1) commit 78ced7975b0665e810834391d826c9f0ef7277e1 on 'wip-binaries'
>> should be reverted, to downgrade mescc-tools to the 0.5.2 release.
>>
>> (2) The 'wip-binaries' tarballs should be uploaded to a new subdirectory
>> of <https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/>, along
>> with digital signatures, of course. I'm talking about these in
>> particular:
>>
>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330 mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0 mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7 static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>
>> (3) The following bootstrap packages in 'core-updates' bootstrap.scm
>> should be updated to use the new binaries above:
>>
>> (a) %bootstrap-linux-libre-headers
>> (b) %bootstrap-mescc-tools
>> (c) %bootstrap-mes
>>
>> (4) Berlin should start rebuilding 'core-updates'.
>>
>> If desired, steps (3) and (4) could come before (2) if someone
>> temporarily uploads the new binaries somewhere else, and adjusts
>> '%bootstrap-base-urls' accordingly. The key is for the hashes and file
>> names to match what we've agreed on here, as I listed in (2) above.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Thank you for the excellent summary. I can look into adjusting the bash
> fix for 5.0, and updating the bootstrap binary URLs and hashes. I will
> do this in a 'core-updates-next' branch. I would also like to merge
> wip-binaries into it as a final step, unless someone has objections.
>
> Ludovic should be back in a couple of days and can hopefully take care
> of the uploads.
I haven’t quite caught up yet, but I trust you and I can upload the
files that Mark mentions above to ftp.gnu.org this time (Ricardo should
also be able to upload them, if needed.)
How can I reproduce them or fetch them?
> Ricardo: can you instruct Cuirass to add a reduced jobset for
> 'core-updates-next', that only builds builds the "core" package subset?
Should be ready now:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next
However, evaluation fails with:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Backtrace:
In guix/packages.scm:
1188:25 19 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
592:29 18 (map1 (("source" #<origin ("http://fossies.org/lin?>) ?))
592:17 17 (map1 (("bash" #<package bash-minimal@4.4.23 gnu/p?>) ?))
In guix/packages.scm:
979:16 16 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
936:16 15 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package bash-minimal@4.4?> ?)
1255:22 14 (thunk)
1188:25 13 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
592:29 12 (map1 (("source" #<origin "mirror://gnu/bash/bash-?>) ?))
592:17 11 (map1 (("gcc" #<package gcc@5.5.0 gnu/packages/boo?>) ?))
In guix/packages.scm:
979:16 10 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
936:16 9 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package gcc@5.5.0 gnu/pa?> ?)
1255:22 8 (thunk)
1188:25 7 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
592:29 6 (map1 (("source" #<origin "mirror://gnu/gcc/gcc-5.?>) ?))
592:17 5 (map1 (("texinfo" #<package texinfo@6.5 gnu/packag?>) ?))
In guix/packages.scm:
979:16 4 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
936:16 3 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package texinfo@6.5 gnu/?> ?)
1255:22 2 (thunk)
1188:25 1 Exception thrown while printing backtrace:
Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &message [message: "texinfo-perl-compat.patch: patch not found"] 56ac3c0>)'.
srfi/srfi-1.scm:592:17: In procedure map1:
Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &message [message: "texinfo-perl-compat.patch: patch not found"] 51bb5c0>)'.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Am I missing something?
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-20 22:43 bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Mark H Weaver
2019-07-21 13:34 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-07-22 0:56 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-07-22 6:18 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-07-22 6:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-07-22 8:26 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-07-22 8:31 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-07-22 17:41 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-07-23 5:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-07-23 6:28 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-08-12 0:21 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-12 4:11 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-07-23 10:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-12 7:08 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-12 9:01 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-08-13 6:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-13 10:17 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2019-08-14 15:03 ` Marius Bakke
2019-08-14 17:29 ` Marius Bakke
2019-08-14 18:35 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-14 18:43 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-14 19:56 ` Marius Bakke
2019-08-14 20:43 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-15 19:44 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-15 21:19 ` Marius Bakke
2019-08-15 23:16 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-15 20:56 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-16 7:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-17 16:49 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-16 10:49 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2019-08-16 16:59 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-17 21:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-18 1:17 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-18 9:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-20 18:40 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-21 20:15 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-21 21:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-21 22:57 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-22 10:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-24 13:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-24 20:34 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-26 8:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-26 18:36 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-27 9:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-29 22:28 ` Bengt Richter
2019-08-27 3:58 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-27 9:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-27 14:27 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-27 16:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-27 16:46 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-28 0:55 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-28 22:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-29 5:46 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-08-29 6:32 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-08-29 19:28 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-29 23:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-08-30 19:52 ` Mark H Weaver
2019-08-31 12:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=36747@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mbakke@fastmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).