From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:49:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org> <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org> <875znt2hlc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyZp1-0007FP-Ez for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:51:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyZp0-0007PT-4v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:51:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyZp0-0007PK-0i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:51:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:56:38 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > Mark H Weaver writes: [...] >> I think what needs to be done is the following: >> >> (1) commit 78ced7975b0665e810834391d826c9f0ef7277e1 on 'wip-binaries' >> should be reverted, to downgrade mescc-tools to the 0.5.2 release. >> >> (2) The 'wip-binaries' tarballs should be uploaded to a new subdirectory >> of , along >> with digital signatures, of course. I'm talking about these in >> particular: >> >> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b gu= ile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz >> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a li= nux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz >> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330 me= scc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz >> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0 me= s-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz >> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7 st= atic-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz >> >> (3) The following bootstrap packages in 'core-updates' bootstrap.scm >> should be updated to use the new binaries above: >> >> (a) %bootstrap-linux-libre-headers >> (b) %bootstrap-mescc-tools >> (c) %bootstrap-mes >> >> (4) Berlin should start rebuilding 'core-updates'. >> >> If desired, steps (3) and (4) could come before (2) if someone >> temporarily uploads the new binaries somewhere else, and adjusts >> '%bootstrap-base-urls' accordingly. The key is for the hashes and file >> names to match what we've agreed on here, as I listed in (2) above. >> >> What do you think? > > Thank you for the excellent summary. I can look into adjusting the bash > fix for 5.0, and updating the bootstrap binary URLs and hashes. I will > do this in a 'core-updates-next' branch. I would also like to merge > wip-binaries into it as a final step, unless someone has objections. > > Ludovic should be back in a couple of days and can hopefully take care > of the uploads. I haven=E2=80=99t quite caught up yet, but I trust you and I can upload the files that Mark mentions above to ftp.gnu.org this time (Ricardo should also be able to upload them, if needed.) How can I reproduce them or fetch them? > Ricardo: can you instruct Cuirass to add a reduced jobset for > 'core-updates-next', that only builds builds the "core" package subset? Should be ready now: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next However, evaluation fails with: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Backtrace: In guix/packages.scm: 1188:25 19 (bag->derivation # # ?) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 592:29 18 (map1 (("source" #) ?)) 592:17 17 (map1 (("bash" #) ?)) In guix/packages.scm: 979:16 16 (expand-input # # ?) 936:16 15 (cache! # # ?) 1255:22 14 (thunk) 1188:25 13 (bag->derivation # # ?) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 592:29 12 (map1 (("source" #) ?)) 592:17 11 (map1 (("gcc" #) ?)) In guix/packages.scm: 979:16 10 (expand-input # # ?) 936:16 9 (cache! # # ?) 1255:22 8 (thunk) 1188:25 7 (bag->derivation # # ?) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 592:29 6 (map1 (("source" #) ?)) 592:17 5 (map1 (("texinfo" #) ?)) In guix/packages.scm: 979:16 4 (expand-input # # ?) 936:16 3 (cache! # # ?) 1255:22 2 (thunk) 1188:25 1 Exception thrown while printing backtrace: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#)'. srfi/srfi-1.scm:592:17: In procedure map1: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#)'. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Am I missing something? Ludo=E2=80=99.