* bug#65606: Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug
@ 2023-08-30 1:12 Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-11-23 4:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2023-08-30 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 65606
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 80 bytes --]
This error occurred on a Cuirass system using guix 4dfdd82 on a Guile
project.
[-- Attachment #2: cuirass-compute-guix-derivation.log --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3066 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#65606: Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug
2023-08-30 1:12 bug#65606: Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2023-11-23 4:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-23 4:39 ` Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2023-11-23 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karl G. Hallsby; +Cc: 65606
Hello,
"Karl G. Hallsby" <karl@hallsby.com> writes:
> fetching path `/gnu/store/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69'...
> Downloading https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69...
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 0B/s 00:00 ? ? 0.0%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 1.6MiB/s 00:00 ?? ? 3.1%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 215KiB/s 00:01 ?? ? 6.2%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 67KiB/s 00:03 ??? ? 9.3%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 66KiB/s 00:04 ???? ? 12.4%Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1752:10 19 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm:
> 99:7 18 (_)
> 105:27 17 (thunk)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 659:37 15 (thunk)
> 2168:25 14 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm:
> 85:6 13 (_ _)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 982:2 12 (_ _)
> 924:2 11 (_ _)
> In guix/monads.scm:
> 487:9 10 (_ _)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 1996:8 9 (_ _)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 675:14 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0>)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2168:25 7 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> 1298:8 6 (call-with-build-handler _ _)
> 1298:8 5 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7fab6e7dd8d8 at g?> ?)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 690:14 4 (_)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2168:25 3 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 191:27 2 (_ #(#(#<directory (build-self) 7fab6d8635a0> #<pr?>) ?))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> ERROR:
> 1. &message: "You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/cxb9kcppq32jvjq3sqld84v2fj1k8hgi-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: \"74d72046bdc1ed6c859565570d0db58d20c9ddd7\"; system: \"x86_64-linux\";\nhost version: \"1.4.0-10.4dfdd82\"; pull-version: 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.\n"
The problem occurred while downloading a substitute, so it seems to be a
bug in 'guix substitute'. Perhaps related to a network problem that was
not correctly handled. The backtrace is not super useful... I wonder
how we could change that.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#65606: Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug
2023-11-23 4:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2023-11-23 4:39 ` Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2023-11-23 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 65606
> The problem occurred while downloading a substitute, so it seems to be a
> bug in 'guix substitute'. Perhaps related to a network problem that was
> not correctly handled.
That might be it. I have completely forgotten what this submission was
about or how I hit it. The only other pieces of information I can
provide is that Cuirass instance is running in a VM on Proxmox and that
I am using the default build mode with the local daemon. This machine is
CI for my personal projects and channels, so a single machine is enough
for building those.
I think this was a transient issue. Doing a "herd restart cuirass" fixed
it, I think.
I have not seen this issue again, though I have seen others with
Cuirass. These new issues do not belong in this thread though.
> The backtrace is not super useful... I wonder how we could change
> that.
Getting better backtraces for Cuirass-issued Guix commands would be
amazing! There are some instances, like this one, where the backtrace
does not help much.
--
Raven Hallsby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-23 4:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-30 1:12 bug#65606: Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-11-23 4:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-11-23 4:39 ` Karl G. Hallsby via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).