unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: "Björn Höfling" <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: 31719@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#31719: Chains of dependencies getting longer
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:36:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s5ltj0o.fsf@elephly.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301231534.1d4e440a@alma-ubu.fritz.box>


Hi Björn,

> On Mon, 01 Mar 2021 22:33:55 +0100
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> It must be a recent regression.  I think this is an unintended
>> side-effect of 44425e1f2a96aee39a21dff634abb9b77b44261e and
>> 84805ef205b7fa12bfaa7b23da06993cab64c40b (see
>> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/41177>):
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut 
>> here---------------start------------->8---
>> $ guix time-machine 
>> --commit=44425e1f2a96aee39a21dff634abb9b77b44261e
>> -- build openjdk -n 2,135.9 MB would be downloaded:
>>    /gnu/store/wd9jyzy7i2dxbxahc0pa8mq22any08zx-openjdk-9.181-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/7zxhm2xmyqds8hvlhifi9d16p9ln9k4b-openjdk-9.181
>>    /gnu/store/j5sh6c7qhm6vis6fvjyxs2jch9dhz085-openjdk-10.46-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/7w3vd4y0jac7d74gw62qmfv7br11k64r-openjdk-10.46
>>    /gnu/store/0sb9z8ds8ly7pwmviaqixq9wq1rp13g5-openjdk-11.28-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/4nf35d4v363bxrfmp85sk671swzmbj5k-openjdk-11.28
>>    /gnu/store/iwi28gcfxrsq541367m4hnp44jnnrkdq-openjdk-12.33-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/2w5gg7v9sy54s1jfnymgvg6qwqnkzr8h-openjdk-13.0-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/sgqw343zlqqn4vpdq4v9m4jy6ar9i99f-openjdk-14.0-doc
>>    /gnu/store/8l4pb8rh9zbqjn14ipbps7nn8wd0jg4w-openjdk-14.0-jdk
>>    /gnu/store/1d5bzdzrir8k13bkclx3a9cq59gw5j4h-openjdk-14.0
>> --8<---------------cut 
>> here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
>> Björn, WDYT?  I suppose we need to filter out some library 
>> names in
>> ‘patch-jni-libs’?
>
> Ouch. While installing a JDK last week, I had the same feeling 
> that the
> dependency chain down was a bit too long, but then forgot to 
> look at it
> again. 
>
> When I read today Andreas' email, it popped up again ... I will 
> have a
> look at it.
>
>> While at it, we should add a #:disallowed-references keyword to
>> prevent that from popping up in the future.
>
> I wasn't aware of this and will also have a look.

Have you been able to identify what’s wrong with the JDK chain? 
I’d like us to drop these extra references soon so that they don’t 
appear in the upcoming release.

-- 
Ricardo




  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-05 10:47 bug#31719: icedtea-3 binaries contain references to icedtea-2 Ricardo Wurmus
2018-06-05 11:49 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-06-05 12:36   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-06-05 12:45   ` Leo Famulari
2018-06-05 14:45     ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-09-10 21:00 ` Gábor Boskovits
2020-05-14 18:02 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-02-27 11:17 ` bug#31719: Chains of dependencies getting longer Andreas Enge
2021-03-01 10:04   ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-01 12:00     ` Andreas Enge
2021-03-01 21:33       ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-01 22:15         ` Björn Höfling
2021-04-14  7:36           ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]
2021-04-16 19:22             ` Björn Höfling
2021-04-16 22:26               ` Carlo Zancanaro
2021-04-17  7:11                 ` Carlo Zancanaro
2021-04-17  9:38                   ` Carlo Zancanaro
2021-04-19 16:22                     ` Andreas Enge
2021-04-19 18:18                       ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-04-20  8:34                         ` Andreas Enge
2021-04-20  9:24                           ` bug#31719: icedtea-3 binaries contain references to icedtea-2 Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-20  9:36                             ` Andreas Enge
2021-04-20 11:32                             ` Carlo Zancanaro
2021-04-20 16:38                               ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-20 21:00                                 ` Carlo Zancanaro
2021-04-21 12:40                                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-20  9:01                         ` bug#31719: Chains of dependencies getting longer Carlo Zancanaro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878s5ltj0o.fsf@elephly.net \
    --to=rekado@elephly.net \
    --cc=31719@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).