unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#33110: Maxima build fails during check phase
@ 2018-10-21 18:17 Diego Nicola Barbato
       [not found] ` <handler.33110.B.154014587610624.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Diego Nicola Barbato @ 2018-10-21 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 33110

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 335 bytes --]

Hello Guix,

After the recent (commit: 82cbe4e0467304e5d8f5931ca4d70617a0e323ba)
update of maxima to version 5.42.0 ‘guix build maxima’ fails during the
‘check’ phase.  I have attached tests/test-suite.log.

I run GuixSD (commit: 2c17bd7b2955beef4130d11b33e07e4fb3b234dc) on an
x86_64 machine.

Greetings,

Diego


[-- Attachment #2: tests/test-suite.log --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 21955 bytes --]

=========================================
   maxima 5.42.0: tests/test-suite.log
=========================================

# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  0
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: gcl-test.sh
=================

Running the share testsuite...
Maxima 5.42.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) build_info()
(%o1) 
Maxima version: "5.42.0"
Maxima build date: "2018-10-21 17:48:29"
Host type: "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
Lisp implementation type: "GNU Common Lisp (GCL)"
Lisp implementation version: "GCL 2.6.12"
(%i2) run_testsuite(share_tests = only)
Testsuite run for GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12:
Running tests in rtestflatten: 43/43 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_z_transform: 36/36 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeilberger_extreme: 9/9 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeilberger: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_boolsimp: 48/48 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_eigen: 13/13 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_odelin: 105/105 tests passed
Running tests in rtestezunits: 277/277 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_numericalio: 69/69 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_simplify_sum: 76/76 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_solve_rec: 30/30 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_stringproc: 81/81 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_opproperties: 117/117 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_stats: 14/14 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_distrib: 86/86 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_descriptive: 107/107 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_interpol: 18/18 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_levin: 104/104 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_fractals: 11/11 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bernstein: 44/44 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_atensor: 20/20 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_ctensor: 45/45 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_itensor: 58/58 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_fourier_elim: 145/145 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sequence: 54/54 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_cholesky: 41/41 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_eigens_by_jacobi: 24/24 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_lu: 52/52 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_linalg: 214/214 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_polynomialp: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_matrixexp: 59/59 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_romberg: 19/19 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_wilcoxon: 29/29 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bitwise: 71/71 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_gf: 10/10 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_namespaces: 86/86 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_arag: 107/107 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_pdiff: 
********************** Problem 62 ***************
Input:
               2
            2 d y       dy                                n
ev((de : 4 x  --- + 4 x -- + (x - 1) y = 0, de : subst(g(x ), y, de), 
                2       dx
              dx
                                      1/n
de : ev(de, diff), de : radcan(subst(x   , x, de)), 
                                                                   1
de : block([ctxt : newcontext(), foo], assume(x >= 0), foo : subst(-, n, de), 
                                                                   2
killcontext(ctxt), foo), convert_to_diff(de)), logexpand)


Result:
     2
 2  d                d              2
x  (--- (g(x))) + x (-- (g(x))) + (x  - 1) g(x) = 0
      2              dx
    dx

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or in the Lisp it was compiled with.
89/89 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_to_poly: 16/16 tests passed (not counting 9 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestprintf: 
********************** Problem 63 ***************
Input:
(3.486966909006701254309886183074014693622265540576239825103417070695233093147\
180625237524509429931641b-22 2.867821881007928E+21, 
printf(false, ~13,6,3,1e, %%), if sequalignore(%%, 1.000000e+000) then true
 else %%)


Result:
true

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or in the Lisp it was compiled with.

********************** Problem 65 ***************
Input:
(printf(false, ~13,6,3,1e, 0.9999999999999999), 
                          if sequalignore(%%, 1.000000e+000) then true else %%)


Result:
true

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or in the Lisp it was compiled with.
59/59 tests passed (not counting 12 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_simplex: 12/12 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_graphs: 99/99 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_abs_integrate: 
log: encountered log(0).
log: encountered log(0).
log: encountered log(0).
178/178 tests passed (not counting 22 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_pochhammer: 36/36 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_to_poly_solve: 184/184 tests passed (not counting 158 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_hg: 186/186 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_nfloat: 
********************** Problem 25 ***************
Input:
                        3
nfloat(map('rhs, solve(x  + x + 1, x)), [], 10)


Result:
[0.3411639019140089 - 1.161541399997251 %i, 
                1.161541399997251 %i + 0.3411639019140089, - 0.682327803828018]

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or in the Lisp it was compiled with.
50/50 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_mnewton: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_solve_rat_ineq: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_vect: 46/46 tests passed (not counting 10 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_antid: 11/11 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_bffac: 16/16 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_grobner: 33/33 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_finance: 14/14 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_fft: 99/99 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_rfft: 46/46 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_decfp: /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/binary/5_42_0/gcl/GCL_2_6_12/share/numeric/decfp-core.c: In function ‘LI11’:
/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/binary/5_42_0/gcl/GCL_2_6_12/share/numeric/decfp-core.c:1727:2: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘writec_stream’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  (void)((writec_stream(char_code(((object)VV[48])),Vstandard_output->s.s_dbind),(((object)VV[48]))));
  ^
/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/binary/5_42_0/gcl/GCL_2_6_12/share/numeric/decfp-core.c:1727:52: error: ‘Vstandard_output’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  (void)((writec_stream(char_code(((object)VV[48])),Vstandard_output->s.s_dbind),(((object)VV[48]))));
                                                    ^
/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/binary/5_42_0/gcl/GCL_2_6_12/share/numeric/decfp-core.c:1727:52: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/binary/5_42_0/gcl/GCL_2_6_12/share/numeric/decfp-core.c:1727:80: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
  (void)((writec_stream(char_code(((object)VV[48])),Vstandard_output->s.s_dbind),(((object)VV[48]))));
                                                                                ^
0/0 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_wrstcse: 12/12 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_draw: execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory
execvp failure when executing 'gnuplot "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gnuplot"': No such file or directory

********************** Problem 130 ***************
Input:
(delete_file(sconcat(file_name_svg, .svg)), 0)


Result:
Condition in MACSYMA-TOP-LEVEL [or a callee]: INTERNAL-SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR: File error on "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.svg": Pathname does not exist
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
0

********************** Problem 131 ***************
Input:
(delete_file(sconcat(file_name_svg, .gif)), 0)


Result:
Condition in MACSYMA-TOP-LEVEL [or a callee]: INTERNAL-SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR: File error on "/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/test_1600364368.gif": Pathname does not exist
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
0

130/132 tests passed

The following 2 problems failed: (130 131)
Running tests in rtest_engineering_format: 15/15 tests passed

Error summary:
Errors found in /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.42.0.drv-0/maxima-5.42.0/share/draw/rtest_draw.mac, problems:
(130 131)
2 tests failed out of 3,988 total tests.
real time       :    404.839 secs
run-gbc time    :    193.169 secs
child run time  :     52.500 secs
gbc time        :    139.130 secs
(%o0)                                done
Running the testsuite for the maxima core...
Maxima 5.42.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) build_info()
(%o1) 
Maxima version: "5.42.0"
Maxima build date: "2018-10-21 17:48:29"
Host type: "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
Lisp implementation type: "GNU Common Lisp (GCL)"
Lisp implementation version: "GCL 2.6.12"
(%i2) load("testsuite.lisp")
(%o2)                           testsuite.lisp
(%i3) testsuite_files:cons("rtest_ask.mac",testsuite_files)
(%o3) [rtest_ask.mac, rtest_rules, rtestnset, [rtest1, 183, 185, 186], 
[rtest1a, 33], [rtest2, 86, 95], rtest4, [rtest5], [rtest6], rtest6a, rtest6b, 
rtest7, rtest9, rtest9a, [rtest10, 24, 25], [rtest11, 158, 174, 175], rtest13, 
rtest13s, rtest14, rtest15, [rtest16], rtestode, rtestode_zp, rtest3, rtest8, 
[rtest12, 76, 78], rexamples, [rtesthyp, 105, 112, 113, 123, 124, 128], 
[rtest_hypgeo, 143], rtestmt19937, rtest_allnummod, rtestconjugate, 
[rtestsum, 3, 4, 18, 75], rtest_trig, rtest_zeta, rtest_diff_invtrig, 
rtest_scalarp, rtest_everysome, rtestint, rtest_numth, rtestifactor, 
[rtest_equal, 157, 160], rtest_abs, [rtest_taylor, 88, 91, 94, 99, 123, 124], 
[rtest_dot], rtest_mset, rtest_boolean, rtest_round, [rtest_map, 2, 3, 4], 
[rtest_sign, 21, 25, 30, 40, 65, 72, 79], rtest_algebraic, [rtest_gamma, 307], 
rtest_expintegral, rtest_signum, rtest_lambert_w, [rtest_elliptic, 129, 143], 
rtest_integrate, rtest_integrate_special, [rtest_sqrt, 89], 
[rtest_carg, 40, 41], [rtest_log], [rtest_power, 19, 20, 26, 58, 65], 
rtestdefstruct, rtest_limit, rtest_powerseries, 
[rtest_laplace, 29, 49, 50, 51, 54, 59, 60, 61, 62, 78, 80], 
rtest_plotoptions, rtest_algsys, rtest_trace]
(%i4) run_testsuite()
Testsuite run for GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12:
Running tests in rtest_ask.mac: 135/135 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_rules: 119/119 tests passed
Running tests in rtestnset: 602/602 tests passed
Running tests in rtest1: 186/186 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest1a: 34/34 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest2: 278/278 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest4: 93/93 tests passed
Running tests in rtest5: 83/83 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6: 46/46 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6a: 65/65 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6b: 27/27 tests passed
Running tests in rtest7: 85/85 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9: 89/89 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9a: 76/76 tests passed
Running tests in rtest10: 60/60 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest11: 242/242 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest13: 23/23 tests passed
Running tests in rtest13s: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest14: 418/418 tests passed
Running tests in rtest15: 379/379 tests passed
Running tests in rtest16: 684/684 tests passed
Running tests in rtestode: 95/95 tests passed
Running tests in rtestode_zp: 30/30 tests passed
Running tests in rtest3: 157/157 tests passed
Running tests in rtest8: 176/176 tests passed
Running tests in rtest12: 77/77 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rexamples: 137/137 tests passed
Running tests in rtesthyp: 417/417 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_hypgeo: 290/290 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestmt19937: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_allnummod: 549/549 tests passed
Running tests in rtestconjugate: 136/136 tests passed
Running tests in rtestsum: 303/303 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_trig: 164/164 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeta: 22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_diff_invtrig: 22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_scalarp: 20/20 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_everysome: 84/84 tests passed
Running tests in rtestint: 315/315 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_numth: 202/202 tests passed
Running tests in rtestifactor: 26/26 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_equal: 205/205 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_abs: 140/140 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_taylor: 147/147 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_dot: 60/60 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_mset: 113/113 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_boolean: 116/116 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_round: 101/101 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_map: 130/130 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sign: 350/350 tests passed (not counting 7 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_algebraic: 45/45 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_gamma: 
********************** Problem 307 ***************
Input:
closeto(gamma_incomplete(2.5b-1, 1.5b0), 1.21154991040338486148603408783689124\
695505238714072062506450000593320225095059234678778878472738878824370305558769\
6201414341094b-1, 4.0b-127)


Result:
true

... Which was correct, but was expected to be wrong due to a known bug in
 Maxima or in the Lisp it was compiled with.
781/781 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_expintegral: 210/210 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_signum: 59/59 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_lambert_w: 57/57 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_elliptic: 177/177 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_integrate: 814/814 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_integrate_special: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_sqrt: 312/312 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_carg: 53/53 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_log: 134/134 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_power: 67/67 tests passed (not counting 5 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestdefstruct: 32/32 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_limit: 215/215 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_powerseries: 67/67 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_laplace: 89/89 tests passed (not counting 11 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_plotoptions: 5/5 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_algsys: 69/69 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_trace: 83/83 tests passed


No unexpected errors found out of 11,726 tests.
real time       :    262.709 secs
run-gbc time    :    161.369 secs
child run time  :      0.740 secs
gbc time        :     89.839 secs
(%o0)                                done


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* bug#33110: Maxima build fails during check phase
       [not found] ` <handler.33110.B.154014587610624.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
@ 2018-12-17 17:25   ` Diego Nicola Barbato
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Diego Nicola Barbato @ 2018-12-17 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 33110-done

Hello Guix,

I am closing this bug report as this has been fixed a while ago and
Maxima has since been updated to version 5.42.1.

I completely forgot about this, sorry!

Diego

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-17 17:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-21 18:17 bug#33110: Maxima build fails during check phase Diego Nicola Barbato
     [not found] ` <handler.33110.B.154014587610624.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2018-12-17 17:25   ` Diego Nicola Barbato

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).