unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: 36544@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> (raw)

The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently
includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the
search-path variables.

First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of the
source directory in these search paths.  However, if you think it's
desirable, there's another problem: it's fragile.  It depends on:

 (1) whether the source is a tarball or an unpacked checkout, and
 (2) whether the subdirectories specified in the search-paths
     (e.g. 'include') are within the top source directory.

Currently, if you change the 'source' field of a package from a tarball
to an (unpacked) VCS checkout, there *might* be additional components
added to the environment variables, depending on the source tree layout.

For example, this causes our 'linux-libre' package to fail to build if
you substitute its 'source' field for a git checkout, as Chris Webber
discovered here:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00058.html
  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00062.html

Also, if any package depends on the current behavior, it will break if
its 'source' is changed from a VCS checkout to a release tarball.

To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I
suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within
the 'set-paths' phase.  What do you think?

Also, does anyone know of other procedures that do something similiar?

     Thanks,
       Mark

             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-07 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-07 23:26 Mark H Weaver [this message]
2019-07-11 21:24 ` bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Ludovic Courtès
2020-12-13 19:30   ` Leo Famulari
2020-12-13 19:35     ` Marius Bakke
2020-06-01  4:51 ` Aiko Kyle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=36544@debbugs.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).