unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>, 25177@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:14:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161217171429.GA29653@jasmine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737hormz7.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:02:20PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you
> >> restart it?
> >
> > Done, thanks for working on this!
> 
> Most of the current failures should now be fixed as well. Do you think
> another Hydra run is necessary? I would like to merge this before the
> release, so I think any remaining failures can be handled directly on
> master for more visibility and testing. WDYT?

There are still ~4000 queued builds:

https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109396?full=1#tabs-unfinished

I'd like to wait for it to be closer to done before merging.

I think it's okay to release without these changes because, in practice,
the bug in question doesn't cause problems for people who are using our
packages, right? My understanding is that people installing from 0.12.0
won't have large numbers of Python packages that fail to build, since we
are dealing with spurious test successes.

It's certainly not desirable to release with this bug, but will there be
"real" problems for users?

What do you think?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-17 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20161211181237.24485-1-ng0@libertad.pw>
     [not found] ` <20161211181237.24485-6-ng0@libertad.pw>
2016-12-11 22:34   ` bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.] Leo Famulari
2016-12-11 23:04     ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-11 23:05       ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-11 23:23         ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-11 23:34           ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-12  7:54       ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-12 15:44         ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-12 22:23           ` Hartmut Goebel
2016-12-13  9:34             ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-13 20:21               ` bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail Marius Bakke
2016-12-13 22:11                 ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-14 12:11                   ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-15  9:26                   ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-15 23:55                     ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-16 14:02                       ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-17 17:14                         ` Leo Famulari [this message]
2016-12-17 17:38                           ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-17 17:56                             ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-17 20:15                               ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-17 23:47                                 ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-18  1:28                                   ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-18 18:55                                     ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-18 19:04                                       ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-20 18:49                                         ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-20 19:30                                           ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-24 13:43                                             ` Marius Bakke
2016-12-24 16:26                                               ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-26 18:33                                                 ` Leo Famulari
2016-12-16  9:23                     ` Hartmut Goebel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161217171429.GA29653@jasmine \
    --to=leo@famulari.name \
    --cc=25177@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com \
    --cc=mbakke@fastmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).