Re: using a module : rename a single definition

[Damien Mattei <damien.mattei@gmail.com>]

thank you for the advice,for now i'm trying with Racket r6rs support and it
is not easy,
the solution in guile seems to be to rename or to use the define-module
style instead of the r6rs library, if only a name in the new library is the
same as an existing name in guile library it is not usable as it is
re-exported as the guile original binding.
If really the problem is so important i'm not sure to use r6rs with guile
now.
regards,
damien

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:47 AM Hans-Werner Roitzsch <hwroitzsch@posteo.net>
wrote:

> Hello Damien,
>
> Be aware though, that porting some exports may not work without renaming
> them:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2023-06/msg00020.html
>
> Regards,
> Zelphir
>
> On 3/27/24 08:42, Damien Mattei wrote:
> > yes it should works. I trying to port all my scheme code in R6RS library
> > style for compatibility,it's a bit complex depending the integration of
> > R6RS in a particular scheme but i think there should be a compatibility
> > advantage doing that.
> >
> > Damien
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:09 AM Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, with ‘library’ or ‘define-library’ forms.
> >>
> >> (see
> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Libraries.html
> )
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> (library (insert name here)
> >>
> >>    (export [insert exports here])
> >>
> >>    (import
> >>
> >>      (guile) ; standard imports
> >>
> >>      (rename (ice-9 popen) (open-pipe pipe-open)))
> >>
> >>    [insert definitions here])
> >>
> >>
> >>
>