* Targeting languages with "return" to tree-il
@ 2017-03-17 0:13 Matt Wette
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matt Wette @ 2017-03-17 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
I have been planing a bit with writing to tree-il to execute on the VM. Since my language has a return
statement I have been using prompts when writing to tree-il. I was wondering if there is an overhead
issue with this. Is there? If so, I was wondering if there is some prompt pattern that the CPS or later
phases would optimize out, (Random guess: CPS passes the continuation to lambdas. Is that right?)
Comment?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-03-17 0:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-17 0:13 Targeting languages with "return" to tree-il Matt Wette
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).