unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Possibility of patching 2.0.5 for armhf support
@ 2014-05-17 16:40 Rob Browning
  2014-05-21 14:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Browning @ 2014-05-17 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guile-devel


I've had a request for armhf support in wheezy (which has 2.0.5), so I
thought I'd ask if you might know offhand what fixed the armhf build in
more recent versions (assuming it was a code change and not something
else like the build toolchain).

For example, 2.0.11 works fine there, but 2.0.5 dies like this:

  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guile-2.0&arch=armhf&ver=2.0.5%2B1-3&stamp=1332497200

(...segmentation faults in 3 of the tests.)

While I probably can't put 2.0.11 in wheezy (stable), I might be able to
add a suitable patch to 2.0.5 -- assuming it doesn't require major
changes.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Possibility of patching 2.0.5 for armhf support
  2014-05-17 16:40 Possibility of patching 2.0.5 for armhf support Rob Browning
@ 2014-05-21 14:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2014-05-21 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guile-devel

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> skribis:

> I've had a request for armhf support in wheezy (which has 2.0.5), so I
> thought I'd ask if you might know offhand what fixed the armhf build in
> more recent versions (assuming it was a code change and not something
> else like the build toolchain).
>
> For example, 2.0.11 works fine there, but 2.0.5 dies like this:
>
>   https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guile-2.0&arch=armhf&ver=2.0.5%2B1-3&stamp=1332497200
>
> (...segmentation faults in 3 of the tests.)

Namely:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/bin/bash: line 5: 16859 Segmentation fault      srcdir="." builddir="." CHARSETALIASDIR="/build/buildd-guile-2.0_2.0.5+1-3-armhf-r0xLJm/guile-2.0-2.0.5+1/lib" GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-with-guile-module
PASS: test-scm-with-guile
/bin/bash: line 5: 16924 Segmentation fault      srcdir="." builddir="." CHARSETALIASDIR="/build/buildd-guile-2.0_2.0.5+1-3-armhf-r0xLJm/guile-2.0-2.0.5+1/lib" GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-scm-spawn-thread
/bin/bash: line 5: 16959 Segmentation fault      srcdir="." builddir="." CHARSETALIASDIR="/build/buildd-guile-2.0_2.0.5+1-3-armhf-r0xLJm/guile-2.0-2.0.5+1/lib" GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-pthread-create
SKIP: test-pthread-create-secondary
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I suspect the main difference is the libgc version, no?  That
test-pthread-create-secondary was skipped indicate that
libgc < 7.2alpha5 was being used here, which may explain the
other problems.

That said, there have been many changes both in Guile and in libgc over
the last 2.5 years.

Ludo’.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-21 14:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-17 16:40 Possibility of patching 2.0.5 for armhf support Rob Browning
2014-05-21 14:03 ` Ludovic Courtès

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).