From: Patrick McCarty <pnorcks@gmail.com>
To: Ian Hulin <ian@hulin.org.uk>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
guile-devel@gnu.org, lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: %module-public-interface
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:50:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402185008.GA7853@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB5DBF7.6050700@hulin.org.uk>
On 2010-04-02, Ian Hulin wrote:
>
> 3. There's a restriction introduced in Guile V2.0 whereby dynamic
> use of define, define-public and variants will cause the guile
> compilation to fail with diagnostics. We have these in our basic
> Scheme files (lily.scm and lily-library.scm). These compilation
> failures currently stop Lilypond building altogether.
This is really just a stricter adherence to the Scheme R5RS.
(if ...) can only contain *expressions*, IIUC, and (define ...) is a
top-level definition, not an expression.
But yes, either LilyPond will need to adapt to these stricter
guidelines, or Guile will loosen its policy with respect to (if ...)
statements.
> 4. We've already seen the %module-public-interface thing in the Lily
> C++. There's probably more smelly stuff lurking in the C++
> interface, which won't surface until we start trying to use Guile
> 2.0 more.
I think almost everything is fixed on the C++ side now.
> Graham, Vincent, is it worth opening a tracker to capture
> forward-compatibility issues with Guile?
We already have one (sort of):
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963
> Thanks for your feedback so far, Ludo. The other Lily developer who
> has done anything with Guile 1.9/V2.0 is Patrick McCarty
> (pnorks@gmail.com).
That's <pnorcks@gmail.com>. I don't want any email reaching the wrong
mailbox. :-)
-Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-02 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 20:45 %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-03-30 20:56 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-30 21:07 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-03-30 21:52 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-30 22:20 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-04-02 0:11 ` %module-public-interface Ian Hulin
2010-04-02 9:37 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
2010-04-02 11:58 ` %module-public-interface Ian Hulin
2010-04-02 18:50 ` Patrick McCarty [this message]
2010-04-03 0:52 ` %module-public-interface Graham Percival
2010-04-06 14:00 ` %module-public-interface Han-Wen Nienhuys
2010-04-06 14:32 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
2010-04-27 20:34 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-05-15 20:32 ` %module-public-interface Ian Hulin
2010-05-21 9:48 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-03-31 20:42 ` Hierarchical name space Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-31 22:31 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-07 22:42 ` Julian Graham
2010-04-07 23:01 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-04-08 7:29 ` Andy Wingo
2010-04-08 8:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-15 6:50 %module-public-interface dsmich
2020-01-15 19:59 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2007-08-10 13:57 %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2007-08-10 14:54 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-30 21:02 ` %module-public-interface Andy Wingo
2010-03-30 21:40 ` %module-public-interface Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100402185008.GA7853@mail.google.com \
--to=pnorcks@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ian@hulin.org.uk \
--cc=lilypond-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).