unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bug#9844: peval & dynamic-wind
@ 2011-10-23 11:48 Ian Price
  2011-11-09 15:58 ` Andy Wingo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Price @ 2011-10-23 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9844


I'm getting incorrect results in v2.0.3 when combining
dynamic-wind+call/cc with partial evaluation. In the program below, the
before-thunk is supposed to protect against reentry into the
body-thunk. However, with partial-evaluation turned on it doesn't error.


(define (test peval?)
  (compile
   '(let ()
      (define (rewind-protect thunk protector)
        (dynamic-wind
          (let ((entered? #f))
            (lambda ()
              (if entered?
                  (error "Re-entering rewind-protected extent."))
              (set! entered? #t)))
          thunk
          protector))
      ((call/cc
        (lambda (k)
          (rewind-protect
           (lambda ()
             (call/cc k)
             (lambda _ 'not-supposed-to-happen))
           (lambda () #f))))
       #f))
   #:opts `(#:partial-eval? ,peval?)))

;; scheme@(guile−user)> (test #t)
;; $1 = not−supposed−to−happen
;; scheme@(guile−user)> (test #f)
;; ERROR: In procedure scm−error:
;; ERROR: Re−entering rewind−protected extent.

;; Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
;; scheme@(#{ g256}#) [1]> ,q
;; scheme@(guile−user)>


If I place a (format #t "entered? ~s~%" entered?) before the (set!
entered? #t), I see


entered? #f
entered? #f
$2 = not−supposed−to−happen


which tells me that the earlier mutation isn't effecting later continuations.

-- 
Ian Price

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* bug#9844: peval & dynamic-wind
  2011-10-23 11:48 bug#9844: peval & dynamic-wind Ian Price
@ 2011-11-09 15:58 ` Andy Wingo
  2011-11-09 19:17   ` Ian Price
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2011-11-09 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Price; +Cc: 9844-done

On Sun 23 Oct 2011 13:48, Ian Price <ianprice90@googlemail.com> writes:

> I'm getting incorrect results in v2.0.3 when combining
> dynamic-wind+call/cc with partial evaluation.

Sorry it's taken so long, but this is fixed now in stable-2.0

Thanks for the report,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* bug#9844: peval & dynamic-wind
  2011-11-09 15:58 ` Andy Wingo
@ 2011-11-09 19:17   ` Ian Price
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Price @ 2011-11-09 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9844


> Sorry it's taken so long, but this is fixed now in stable-2.0

Yes, this works fine for me. Much appreciated.

-- 
Ian Price

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-09 19:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-23 11:48 bug#9844: peval & dynamic-wind Ian Price
2011-11-09 15:58 ` Andy Wingo
2011-11-09 19:17   ` Ian Price

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).