unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bug#21894: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability
@ 2015-11-12 23:27 Zefram
  2016-06-24 16:20 ` Andy Wingo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zefram @ 2015-11-12 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 21894

The manual says

#                  Escape continuations are delimited continuations whose
# only use is to make a non-local exit--i.e., to escape from the current
# continuation.  Such continuations are invoked only once, and for this
# reason they are sometimes called "one-shot continuations".

O RLY?

scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (ice-9 control))
scheme@(guile-user)> (define cc #f)
scheme@(guile-user)> (list 'a (let/ec e (list 'b (e (call-with-current-continuation (lambda (c) (set! cc c) 0))))))
$1 = (a 0)
scheme@(guile-user)> (cc 1)
$2 = (a 1)
scheme@(guile-user)> (cc 2)
$3 = (a 2)

Clearly I have invoked this escape continuation, successfully, more
than once.  The semantics here are perfectly sensible, it's just
the documentation that's off the mark, because it ignores how escape
continuations interact with other kinds of continuation.  I suggest
changing "Such continuations are invoked only once" sentence to something
like

    Such continuations can only be invoked from within the dynamic
    extent of the call to which they will jump.  Because the jump
    ends that extent, if escape continuations are the only kind of
    continuations being used it is only possible to invoke an escape
    continuation at most once.  For this reason they are sometimes
    called "one-shot continuations", but that is a misnomer when other
    kinds of continuations are also in use.  Most kinds can reinstate a
    dynamic extent that has been exited, and if the extent of an escape
    continuation is reinstated then it can be invoked again to exit that
    extent again.  Conversely, an escape continuation cannot be invoked
    from a separate thread that has its own dynamic state not including
    the continuation's extent, even if the continuation's extent is
    still in progress in its original thread and the continuation has
    never been invoked.

-zefram





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* bug#21894: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability
  2015-11-12 23:27 bug#21894: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability Zefram
@ 2016-06-24 16:20 ` Andy Wingo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2016-06-24 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zefram; +Cc: 21894-done

On Fri 13 Nov 2015 00:27, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> writes:

> #                  Escape continuations are delimited continuations whose
> # only use is to make a non-local exit--i.e., to escape from the current
> # continuation.  Such continuations are invoked only once, and for this
> # reason they are sometimes called "one-shot continuations".
>
> O RLY?

:)

I removed that last sentence.  By saying less it will be less possible
to enter into this kind of error :)

Thanks for the report,

Andy

BTW: You have submitted some really nice reports!  If you would like to
assign copyright to the FSF so that you can get patches into Guile, let
me know and I can send you the docs.  Cheers :)





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-24 16:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-12 23:27 bug#21894: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability Zefram
2016-06-24 16:20 ` Andy Wingo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).