Re: master 9f5ca95ef77: * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el (comp-known-type-specifiers): Fix a bunch of

Re: master 9f5ca95ef77: * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el (comp-known-type-specifiers): Fix a bunch of

[Ruijie Yu via Emacs development discussions.]

Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:

> branch: master
> commit 9f5ca95ef770fe43aa6700b238361ec76da7f3fa
> Author: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
> Commit: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>
>     * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el (comp-known-type-specifiers): Fix a bunch of
> ---
>  lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> index b2704ae1446..2ea405728a3 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> [...]
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Useful to hook into pass checkers.")
>      (concat (function (&rest sequence) string))
>      (cons (function (t t) cons))
>      (consp (function (t) boolean))
> -    (coordinates-in-window-p (function (cons window) boolean))
> +    (coordinates-in-window-p (function (cons window) (or cons null (member bottom-divider right-divider mode-line header-line tab-line left-fringe right-fringe vertical-line left-margin right-margin))))
> [...]

Hmm... Isn't this line a bit too long?  :)

But now that I look at the context, I see that the `compare-strings'
entry (4 lines above) has a similar length, so I don't know if we should
/ need to reflow them below the 80 or 66 fill-column limit.

-- 
Best,


RY