all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>, larsi@gnus.org, 45072@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45072: 28.0.50; Emacs switches other buffer back uncontrollably, if other window's buffer is changed by user during minibuffer editing
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:30:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9HctL/WTECDMiD8@protected.rcdrun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57c673d0-e6e7-120d-8893-92b02ab1530e@gmx.at>

* martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> [2020-12-10 10:45]:
> > What do you think about let-binding a new variable
> > read-minibuffer-record-windows to nil around functions
> > that pop up completion windows?
> >
> > I mean for example in minibuffer-completion-help:
> >
> >    (let ((read-minibuffer-record-windows nil))
> >      (display-completion-list completions))
> >
> > The default value of read-minibuffer-record-windows could be t,
> > so it will record new windows created by the user, e.g. by C-x 2.
> > But when let-bound to nil, it won't record windows created
> > by completion commands, so these windows won't be restored
> > after exiting the minibuffer.
> 
> We'd have to augment the 'quit-restore' mechanism somehow and run it on
> all windows instead of restoring the configuration.
> 
> But I still don't understand the logic of the following:
> 
> (1) Start minibuffer interaction, type a-
> 
> (2) Pop up a completion window for a- and accept suggestion a-b
> 
> (3) Type another - so you now get a-b-
> 
> (4) Pop up a completion window for a-b- and accept a-b-c
> 
> In this scenario I'd want, after accepting a-b, the completion window to
> disappear (or show its old buffer again) without the minibuffer action
> having terminated.  So I'm still convinced that restoring a previous
> state should be triggered by the completion mechanism and not by the
> read from minibuffer mechanism.

I am trying to see relevance here, maybe I miss something. The
built-in completion does not replace the window which I am looking it.
It may make its visible part somewhat smaller, but not replace it.

Then I change buffers in those windows. Apart from being made somewhat
narrower, windows are not replaced by completion. 

And I did not even use completion. I was entering information on minibuffer.

> One thing that has to be considered too is user interaction during
> completion: Suppose I have one window, the completion mechanism pops up
> a new one and I delete the old one

I have not ever see that in built-in Emacs completion. But maybe it exists. 

I have seen completion poping up new window, but not replacing or
deleting other window.

Jean





  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 14:07 bug#45072: 28.0.50; Emacs switches other buffer back uncontrollably, if other window's buffer is changed by user during minibuffer editing Jean Louis
2020-12-07 16:10 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-12-07 16:42   ` Jean Louis
2020-12-07 17:20     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-07 18:49       ` Jean Louis
2020-12-07 19:27         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-07 19:45           ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08  8:09           ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08 14:09             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-12-08 14:18               ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 14:47               ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08 14:58                 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 16:08                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-08 16:14                     ` Jean Louis
2020-12-08 15:51               ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-09  9:33                 ` martin rudalics
2021-08-03  7:57                   ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-04  6:52                     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-04  8:39                       ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-04  8:56                         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-04 20:17                           ` Juri Linkov
2021-08-05 10:55                             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-08-05 23:36                               ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-08 19:15             ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-09  9:34               ` martin rudalics
2020-12-09 10:06                 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-09 15:16                   ` martin rudalics
2020-12-09 19:11                 ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-10  7:44                   ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10  8:30                     ` Jean Louis [this message]
2020-12-10  9:46                       ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 10:16                         ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 11:52                           ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 12:07                             ` Jean Louis
2020-12-11  9:39                               ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-12  1:47                                 ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10  8:32                     ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-10  9:47                       ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 10:21                         ` Jean Louis
2020-12-10 11:52                           ` martin rudalics
2020-12-10 12:21                             ` Jean Louis
2020-12-12 20:49                         ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-13  7:26                           ` martin rudalics
2020-12-14 20:28                             ` Juri Linkov
2020-12-15  7:59                               ` martin rudalics
2021-01-15  8:57                               ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-19 13:54                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 16:02                                   ` martin rudalics
2021-04-19 18:09                                     ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-19 13:52                               ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 16:02                                 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-19 16:22                                   ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-19 17:11                                     ` martin rudalics
2020-12-08  5:33       ` Richard Stallman
2020-12-08 15:13         ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X9HctL/WTECDMiD8@protected.rcdrun.com \
    --to=bugs@gnu.support \
    --cc=45072@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.