bug#59816: 29.0.60; c++-ts-mode handles one-line comments badly

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:

> On 6 December 2022 00:16:53 CET, "Herman, Géza" <geza.herman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hi Theo, yes, it works correctly with your patch, thanks!
>>
>>On 12/5/22 14:21, Theodor Thornhill wrote:
>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>> 
>>>>> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
>>>>> Cc: geza.herman@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org
>>>>> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:44:49 +0100
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're right.  This is my bad.  This patch addresses it.  What do you
>>>>> think, Eli?
>>>> I'll defer to people who know more than I do about these modes.
>>>> 
>>> Sure, added Yuan to CC.
>>> 
>>>>> BTW - I see that many modes in general don't refer to their
>>>>> syntax-tables in their define-derived-mode form.  Is that intentional?
>>>> The ELisp manual says:
>>>> 
>>>>   -- Macro: define-derived-mode variant parent name docstring
>>>>            keyword-args... body...
>>>>       This macro defines VARIANT as a major mode command, using NAME as
>>>>       the string form of the mode name.  VARIANT and PARENT should be
>>>>       unquoted symbols.
>>>> 
>>>>       The new command VARIANT is defined to call the function PARENT,
>>>>       then override certain aspects of that parent mode:
>>>> 
>>>>          [...]
>>>> 
>>>>          • The new mode has its own syntax table, kept in the variable
>>>>            ‘VARIANT-syntax-table’, unless you override this using the
>>>>            ‘:syntax-table’ keyword (see below).  ‘define-derived-mode’
>>>>            makes the parent mode’s syntax-table the parent of
>>>>            ‘VARIANT-syntax-table’, unless the latter is already set and
>>>>            already has a parent different from the standard syntax table.
>>>> 
>>>> So there's no need to mention it because it happens automatically.
>>> Right, thanks!
>>> 
>>> Can you test this patch, Herman, and see if it works for you now?
>>> 
>>> Theo
>>
>
> Nice, thanks for testing!
> Yuan, will you apply this patch?
> Theo

Applied the patch, Thanks!

Yuan