From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Payas Relekar <relekarpayas@gmail.com>,
rms@gnu.org, susam.pal@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 06:52:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lehv2wd9.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83y1lv5qe9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 May 2023 09:33:02 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Payas Relekar <relekarpayas@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>, susam.pal@gmail.com,
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 10:53:15 +0530
>>
>> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Why use the name "Devil" for this? It doesn't seen to explain anything
>> > about the package's purpose. It is likely to put some people off.
>>
>> Every name is going to put someone or another off, can't really help it.
>> OpenBSD has their daemon and there are already funny anecdotes about it,
>> but it doesn't hurt anyone.
Also, "daemon" is not just an OpenBSD thing.
> "daemon" is a term whose meaning in computing context is widely
> accepted for many years. "Devil' isn't.
I agree.
>> > If there is no clear reason why "Devil" is a good name, let's choose
>> > a better name now.
>>
>> As mentioned by Susam in previous mail, as well as the repo README, the
>> name refers both to 'eVil' (extensible Vi Layer) as well as 'God-mode'.
>
> People are extremely unlikely to understand that, even if they know
> about Evil in Emacs. And even if they do figure out this is related
> to Evil, the truth is that the package is not meant to be used by
> users of Evil.
I think it is more likely than you assume if you ask enthusiasts, but if
we consider the average user who doesn't hang around in Emacs-related
forums, chats, etc. then this is very true.
>> The name is distinct, and I like it for what it is.
>
> Please reconsider, I think this name is very unfortunate, because it
> gives users no clue whatsoever about the package's purpose.
Susam, what do you say? Do you have any ideas? A few names I can think
of might be:
- no-modifier-mode
- prefixless-mode
- implicit-ctrl-mode
- comma->control-mode
but I'm not really convinced by any of these (haven't really used the
package yet either). Perhaps this might inspire someone else to come up
with a better suggestion?
If you really insist, then I think we really have to come up with a
better description, because "Minor mode for Devil-like command entering"
is really confusing.
> Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 5:23 [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil Payas Relekar
2023-05-11 6:26 ` Po Lu
2023-05-11 6:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 6:52 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2023-05-11 7:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-12 15:02 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-11 8:09 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 8:45 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-11 8:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 9:08 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 9:12 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-11 9:19 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 9:34 ` Ruijie Yu via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-11 10:09 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 10:31 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 8:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-12 16:19 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-13 7:10 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-13 9:05 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-15 22:12 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-17 13:30 ` João Távora
2023-05-17 14:06 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-17 15:41 ` João Távora
2023-05-17 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-13 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-14 4:29 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil) Jim Porter
2023-05-14 7:47 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-14 19:23 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-14 19:33 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-19 3:49 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-19 4:33 ` Akib Azmain Turja
2023-05-20 16:51 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-21 21:03 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-14 21:36 ` Stefan Monnier via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-14 22:17 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-14 23:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-05-15 1:36 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-15 22:15 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil) Richard Stallman
2023-05-15 22:15 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-16 4:51 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-16 8:42 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages Madhu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-09 1:57 [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil Susam Pal
2023-05-09 8:42 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-09 8:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-09 8:58 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-09 18:19 ` chad
2023-05-09 22:07 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-09 20:56 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-10 6:09 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-10 21:00 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-10 21:56 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lehv2wd9.fsf@posteo.net \
--to=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=relekarpayas@gmail.com \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=susam.pal@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.