bug#65418: 29.1; Eglot: support clangd inactiveRegions extension

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 11:51:33 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Felician Nemeth <felician.nemeth@gmail.com>, 65418@debbugs.gnu.org, 
> 	Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> 
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 5:09 AM Filippo Argiolas
> <filippo.argiolas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 5:59 AM Filippo Argiolas
> > <filippo.argiolas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 3:06 AM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 2:05 AM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:28 PM Filippo Argiolas
> > > > > <filippo.argiolas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 3:58 PM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Glad to help.  You're lucky I'm not some kind of wine connoisseur ;-)
> > > > > > > Make a patch for that (and remember to also include the exportation of
> > > > > > > the '--' symbols).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many thanks again! That code definitely made this work week more enjoyable ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for the delay with the patch, little time left these days for
> > > > > > side projects or even trivial contributions like this.
> > > > > > See if the attached patches could do!
> > > > >
> > > > > They were very helpful.  I just pushed heavily edited versions of
> > > > > them to master.  I used them as a starting point and credited you as
> > > > > co-author (I could have done the other way round, crediting myself
> > > > >  as co-author, but the changes I did were a bit too extensive for
> > > > > that).
> > >
> > > No problem for me, edit as much as you want! just glad to help.
> > > I'd be just as happy if you just thanked me in the commit message.
> >
> > By the way I looked at your doc version and very much approve it. The
> > one about public API I think I don't even deserve co-authorship :-D
> 
> It's mainly because i started by applying your patch then doing multiple
> changes to them.
> 
> My intuition also tells me that the remnants of both your
> contribution are indeed "trivial" (as measured both in absolute LOC
> and complexity)
> 
> But  I admit I'm not fully aware of how these things are counted
> "officially", so better safe than sorry and I reverted them.  But
> I would very much like to re-revert of course, as this was a lot
> of work and is a pretty valuable change, IMO.  Let's wait for Eli to
> explain how to proceed.

To provide a helpful answer I need to know how much code was provided
by Filippo.  Where can I see that?