bug#58950: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (buffer-match-p): Optimise performance

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 05/01/2023 06:31, Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the 
Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:
>>>> I'd like to let our language-level specialists to take the deeper look.
> Do we have any reason to believe that the performance of
> `buffer-match-p` is a problem in `display-buffer-alist`?
> 
> The benchmark you quote seems to be fairly different from what
> `display-buffer` does.  I'm not surprised your optimization improves
> this benchmark, but I'm wondering whether this use-case corresponds to
> a real life situation (and if so which).

I was also wondering that.

>>>> On the last note, I'm curious how many buffers would it take to see a
>>>> 50ms improvement in match-buffers' runtime when using the current
>>>> project-kill-buffer-conditions's value, for example.
> Also, where is `match-buffers` used?  I only see it used in
> `lisp/net/rcirc.el` in a way that can trivially be replaced with
> something much more efficient.

I suppose it could replace the use of dolist+project--buffer-check 
inside project--buffers-to-kill. But the main target of the patch under 
discussion is buffer-match-p, of course.