bug#59251: Acknowledgement (29.0.50; Fix-some-inconsistencies-in-ts-modes)

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

> On Nov 13, 2022, at 11:06 PM, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:
> 
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Theodor Thornhill via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Added a few more finishes.
>>> 
>>> Aaand another.  Last one for now.  I promise…
>> 
>> Cool! Some comments:
>> 
>> +(defcustom c-ts-mode-font-lock-feature-list
>> +  '((comment preprocessor operator constant string literal keyword)
>> +    (type definition expression statement)
>> +    ())
>> +  "Language constructs to font-lock.
>> +
>> +See `treesit-font-lock-feature-list' for description of how to
>> +use this variable.  Supported features are as defined in
>> +`c-ts-mode--font-lock-settings'."
>> +  :version "29.1"
>> +  :type 'list
>> +  :safe 'listp
>> +  :group 'c)
>> +
>> 
>> I think Stefan M’s opinion is to make feature-list private, and let
>> users add/remove features. Right now they can add/remove features with
>> treesit-recompute-feature-list. I guess we can keep them as defvar’s
>> for now, so people as the option to redefine this list should they
>> want to. (One argument against having them as custom options is that,
>> if a user sets it as a custom option, they will miss out on future
>> changes to this variable.)
>> 
>> 
>> +  (setq-local comment-style c-ts-mode-comment-style)
>> 
>> Why don’t we let users set comment style themselves? Does cc-mode have a similar variable?
>> 
> 
> You have a point.  Simplified the patch.
> 
> Theo
> 
> <0001-Fix-some-inconsistencies-in-ts-modes.patch>

Thanks, merged and pushed.

Yuan