From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Another question about lambdas
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 01:00:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn6yyflc.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 861qp67wgm.fsf@gnu.org
Hello Arash,
it seems you didn't notice that you participated in a quiz!
> > What's the result of the following expression - and why? Or maybe
> > it is invalid?
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> > (let* ((x 'l)
> > (f (lambda () x))
> > (x 'd))
> > (funcall f))
> > #+end_src
> With lexical or with dynamic binding?
"With lexical or with dynamic binding?" is the correct answer to the
question.
Yes, the result depends on whether the expression is evaluated with
lexical binding or with dynamic. The symbol names intended to give a
discrete hint (maybe too discrete).
So if we did not have the variable `lexical-binding' to check whether
lexical binding is used for evaluation, you could use a test like this:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(let* ((lb t)
(getlex (lambda () lb))
(lb nil))
(funcall getlex))
#+end_src
I'm sorry that this was again a type "trap" question (everybody in the
trap can come out again now).
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-10 17:23 Another question about lambdas Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 19:33 ` tomas
2022-12-10 20:29 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 20:03 ` Emanuel Berg
2022-12-12 1:50 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-18 11:52 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:23 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 21:58 ` Arash Esbati
2022-12-11 0:00 ` Michael Heerdegen [this message]
2022-12-11 0:09 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-11 7:02 ` tomas
2022-12-12 1:56 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-12 5:24 ` tomas
2022-12-12 6:22 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-18 11:51 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:24 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-19 13:38 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-30 17:44 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-03 0:20 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-25 7:31 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-27 8:28 ` tomas
2023-01-18 11:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-18 11:33 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:32 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-13 11:26 ` Arash Esbati
2022-12-14 2:22 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-11 0:13 ` Gregory Heytings
2022-12-11 0:38 ` Michael Heerdegen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wn6yyflc.fsf@web.de \
--to=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).