unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Another question about lambdas
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 02:56:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qp5o05o.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Y5WAlJv0bqddwYH1@tuxteam.de

<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:

> (now let me get out of the trap: I have to admit that I didn't stop
> to think about dynamic binding).

At university I learned that lexical binding would be more intuitive to
understand, but harder to implement.  I thought I was special because I
always found dynamic binding more intuitive.  I thought it was because I
learned Lisp mostly by using Emacs, at a time where lexical binding was
only available using a strange thing called `lexical-let' (AFAIR you had
to require cl to use it).

But it seems that dynamic binding is the more intuitive scoping rule for
a lot of people.  And a lot have their problems with lexical binding and
closures.

Michael.




  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-10 17:23 Another question about lambdas Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 19:33 ` tomas
2022-12-10 20:29   ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 20:03 ` Emanuel Berg
2022-12-12  1:50   ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-18 11:52     ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:23       ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-10 21:58 ` Arash Esbati
2022-12-11  0:00   ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-11  0:09     ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-11  7:02     ` tomas
2022-12-12  1:56       ` Michael Heerdegen [this message]
2022-12-12  5:24         ` tomas
2022-12-12  6:22           ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-18 11:51             ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:24               ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-19 13:38               ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-01-30 17:44                 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-03  0:20                   ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-02-25  7:31                     ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-27  8:28                       ` tomas
2023-01-18 11:47           ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-18 11:33         ` Emanuel Berg
2023-01-19 13:32           ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-13 11:26     ` Arash Esbati
2022-12-14  2:22       ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-12-11  0:13 ` Gregory Heytings
2022-12-11  0:38   ` Michael Heerdegen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871qp5o05o.fsf@web.de \
    --to=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).