From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Cc: David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com>,
Rudolf Schlatte <rudi@constantly.at>,
help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: package-autoremove ?
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:56:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r9zqyto.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmxjsdrf.fsf@posteo.net>
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
Hi Philip,
>> (setopt custom-file (expand-file-name
>> "custom.el"
>> (if user-init-file
>> (file-name-directory user-init-file)
>> "~/.emacs.d/")))
>
> What is the point of this check?
When emacs runs with -batch, user-init-file is nil and my system-update
script contains an emacs package update step running
emacs -batch -l ~/.emacs.d/init.el -f package-upgrade-all
> FWIW my init.el starts with
>
> (load (setq custom-file (locate-user-emacs-file "custom.el")) t)
>
> and I have never had issues with it.
I'll try if that also works with -batch. Thanks!
>> (load custom-file t)
>
>> Now on two machines which should have pretty much the same emacs setup
>> (pretty current git master with the same init.el containing the same
>> use-package with :ensure t statements), package-autoremove suggests
>> different removal sets. The union of both sets contains many packages
>> installed by use-package which are certainly wrong.
>
> I have little to no experience with use-package, so I am not the best
> person to help here. Have you reported this behaviour as a bug?
Not yet but I'll do so.
Bye,
Tassilo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 4:00 package-autoremove ? David Masterson
2023-08-22 12:17 ` Rudolf Schlatte
2023-08-25 4:52 ` David Masterson
2023-08-25 7:38 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-08-25 8:40 ` Tassilo Horn
2023-08-25 8:54 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-08-25 8:56 ` Tassilo Horn [this message]
2023-08-25 12:58 ` Tassilo Horn
2023-08-26 2:01 ` David Masterson
2023-08-26 1:50 ` David Masterson
2023-08-26 12:03 ` Philip Kaludercic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-03 4:35 David Masterson
2020-09-03 6:38 ` Pankaj Jangid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r9zqyto.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=tsdh@gnu.org \
--cc=dsmasterson@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=rudi@constantly.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).