From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: package-autoremove ? Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:56:20 +0200 Message-ID: <878r9zqyto.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cyzbtvv8.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyzbqzbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxjsdrf.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2718"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.11.15; emacs 30.0.50 Cc: David Masterson , Rudolf Schlatte , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 25 11:03:45 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZSjJ-0000Py-59 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:03:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZSiQ-0003O1-Lu; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZSiP-0003Nd-9m for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:02:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZSiM-0005r7-TD; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:02:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From: References; bh=5MX7QmhB7A2qLyomhOA7FxF/wpKBaRwojrNF7wT+ioQ=; b=dwNlWJxzP5yhVL KKjSP0Lqz9rjntFcT5WPZLDhScD1wRQ0FOnNaDZvvNpwnOatigKc/SvjaououIItRNx8B5/JIsVv7 x9gEYMKLlIy8cbWpcFUSm4vye2pOx/OQmG6ZJtU5flR+RIeQsZJRdj5ae0chfjSd1Bj5K4h2cnuA8 XthF1Wo4OThlGn5h6EIuvvj0vZ1QyPy2WZHj5HCjaMLSuVhBWcZhVvKv6heB4qtDYieOWOReUo+Jd LbFfYK3F1F0rNhH1P9eS0ZLI7/yTo/Rkl7SJxemUSgVfa4EkNxJiHdmIODH7jyt7hgWyapwbqM/DJ j/iwfpL1yWHxaqkUoxSQ==; X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedruddvkedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvvefuffgjkfggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhs ihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhsughhsehgnhhurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpe dujedtheduvdelffejkeetgedvheelhedvueefhfeukeekkeehvdfggeegffevgfenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhorhhnod hmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdekieejfeekjeekgedqieefhedv leekqdhtshguhheppehgnhhurdhorhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ib2b94485:Fastmail In-reply-to: <87wmxjsdrf.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:144959 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: Hi Philip, >> (setopt custom-file (expand-file-name >> "custom.el" >> (if user-init-file >> (file-name-directory user-init-file) >> "~/.emacs.d/"))) > > What is the point of this check? When emacs runs with -batch, user-init-file is nil and my system-update script contains an emacs package update step running emacs -batch -l ~/.emacs.d/init.el -f package-upgrade-all > FWIW my init.el starts with > > (load (setq custom-file (locate-user-emacs-file "custom.el")) t) > > and I have never had issues with it. I'll try if that also works with -batch. Thanks! >> (load custom-file t) > >> Now on two machines which should have pretty much the same emacs setup >> (pretty current git master with the same init.el containing the same >> use-package with :ensure t statements), package-autoremove suggests >> different removal sets. The union of both sets contains many packages >> installed by use-package which are certainly wrong. > > I have little to no experience with use-package, so I am not the best > person to help here. Have you reported this behaviour as a bug? Not yet but I'll do so. Bye, Tassilo