From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
johnw@gnu.org, friedman@splode.com
Subject: Re: [friedman@splode.com: some other observations on pcomplete]
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:51:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vafhenfwmif.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203150342.g2F3gBT06509@wijiji.santafe.edu> (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:42:11 -0700 (MST)")
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> It looks like pcomplete potentially has useful features.
> But it is not ready for adoption now as the default.
I'm a little surprised by this conclusion. So far, it appeared to me
that some of the pcomplete variables had the wrong default values,
but I don't recall anything that couldn't be fixed by frobbing some
variables.
How about giving John a chance to frob the variables to make the
behavior more similar to the old completion behavior?
kai
--
Silence is foo!
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-17 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-10 21:32 [friedman@splode.com: some other observations on pcomplete] Richard Stallman
2002-03-11 6:29 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-11 6:48 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-11 7:53 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-11 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-11 19:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-11 19:35 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-12 10:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-12 19:44 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-13 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-13 18:09 ` Colin Walters
2002-03-14 12:42 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-14 19:29 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-11 23:58 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-11 20:46 ` Colin Walters
2002-03-12 18:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-12 18:13 ` Noah Friedman
2002-03-13 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-13 12:38 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-13 23:00 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-15 3:42 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 9:51 ` Kai Großjohann [this message]
2002-03-17 19:22 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-19 16:15 ` Kai Großjohann
[not found] <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020314163415.20226A@is>
2002-03-15 16:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-15 19:42 ` Jason Rumney
2002-03-17 10:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 11:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-18 9:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 9:17 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-03-17 19:22 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vafhenfwmif.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--to=kai.grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=friedman@splode.com \
--cc=johnw@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).