From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: johnw@gnu.org, friedman@splode.com
Subject: [friedman@splode.com: some other observations on pcomplete]
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:32:41 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200203102132.g2ALWfr04155@wijiji.santafe.edu> (raw)
I think someone is fixing the first of these problems,
but the rest seem severe enough that I think we should
revert the change and put Shell mode completion back the
way it was.
Could someone please make that change?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com>
To: johnw@gnu.org
CC: rms@gnu.org
Subject: some other observations on pcomplete
Reply-To: Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Some other things I've observed about the new completion behavior:
* It doesn't complete command names or variable names anymore, e.g. I
cannot type "$HOME/ma<TAB>" and have it complete to "$HOME/mail".
As far as I can tell this is because the tab key has been rebound in the
new version from comint-dynamic-complete to shell-pcomplete, but I don't
know if shell-pcomplete was supposed to be using the old variable/command
completion helpers.
* It's inconsistent with the rest of emacs. Instead of doing partial
completion and then showing me a list of completing matches, it sometimes
does a full completion of just one alternative, which may lead me to
believe that is the only match.
* It's not even consistent with itself. Sometimes it does a full
completion (if there are only a small number of possible completions) but
other times it displays a completion buffer. That goes even further to
reinforce my expectation that when a full completion is made, that's the
only available completion!
* Sometimes I want to cd into a directory so I type some prefix of the
directory name. Because of the two points above, I don't know if that's
the only match or not so I hit tab twice. Now, since that is the only
match, I get a list of completions in the subdirectory.
So completion on a directory name sometimes replaces a directory name
with another complete match, and sometimes it descends into the directory
and produces a completion list on files below. Behavior is surprising.
Overall I find the new behavior confusing and surprising. Perhaps this new
mode emulates the completion behavior of some shell I've never used, but I
think emacs should be more self-consistent. I would suggest changing the
defaults to behave as much as possible in a manner consistent with
completion in the rest of emacs.
------- End of forwarded message -------
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-10 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-10 21:32 Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-03-11 6:29 ` [friedman@splode.com: some other observations on pcomplete] John Wiegley
2002-03-11 6:48 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-11 7:53 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-11 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-11 19:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-11 19:35 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-12 10:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-12 19:44 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-13 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-13 18:09 ` Colin Walters
2002-03-14 12:42 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-14 19:29 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-11 23:58 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-11 20:46 ` Colin Walters
2002-03-12 18:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-12 18:13 ` Noah Friedman
2002-03-13 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-13 12:38 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-13 23:00 ` John Wiegley
2002-03-15 3:42 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 9:51 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-03-17 19:22 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-19 16:15 ` Kai Großjohann
[not found] <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020314163415.20226A@is>
2002-03-15 16:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-15 19:42 ` Jason Rumney
2002-03-17 10:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 11:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-18 9:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-17 9:17 ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-03-17 19:22 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200203102132.g2ALWfr04155@wijiji.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=friedman@splode.com \
--cc=johnw@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).