unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* pop-to-buffer-same-window
@ 2011-09-01 16:14 Chong Yidong
  2011-09-01 16:25 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
  2011-09-02  2:43 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2011-09-01 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Was there any particular reason for adding a separate
pop-to-buffer-same-window function, as opposed to adding an additional
meaning to pop-to-buffer's OTHER-WINDOW argument, i.e.

  (pop-to-buffer buffer 'same-window)

?  I don't recall any such discussion when pop-to-buffer-same-window was
originally introduced, but could be mistaken.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: pop-to-buffer-same-window
  2011-09-01 16:14 pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
@ 2011-09-01 16:25 ` Chong Yidong
  2011-09-02  2:43 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2011-09-01 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:

> Was there any particular reason for adding a separate
> pop-to-buffer-same-window function, as opposed to adding an additional
> meaning to pop-to-buffer's OTHER-WINDOW argument, i.e.
>
>   (pop-to-buffer buffer 'same-window)
>
> ?  I don't recall any such discussion when pop-to-buffer-same-window was
> originally introduced, but could be mistaken.

I guess the main reason for a separate `pop-to-buffer-same-window' is to
provide a separate command for users to bind to.  Is that the reason?
If so, is `pop-to-buffer-same-window' supposed to supplant interactive
calls to switch-to-buffer?

Someone who uses dedicated windows (Stefan?) should probably weigh in.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: pop-to-buffer-same-window
  2011-09-01 16:14 pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
  2011-09-01 16:25 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
@ 2011-09-02  2:43 ` Stefan Monnier
  2011-09-02 14:26   ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-09-02  2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong; +Cc: emacs-devel

> Was there any particular reason for adding a separate
> pop-to-buffer-same-window function, as opposed to adding an additional
> meaning to pop-to-buffer's OTHER-WINDOW argument, i.e.

>   (pop-to-buffer buffer 'same-window)

I think the reason was so as to avoid adding some special handling for
a new special value `same-window'.  This second argument should be
a RULE (previously known as ACTION) and the special-case of
`not-this-window' is annoying enough.

This said, with the new switch-to-buffer's FORCE-SAME-WINDOW, we don't
need pop-to-buffer-same-window since switch-to-buffer works just as well.


        Stefan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: pop-to-buffer-same-window
  2011-09-02  2:43 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-09-02 14:26   ` Chong Yidong
  2011-09-02 14:50     ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2011-09-02 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> This said, with the new switch-to-buffer's FORCE-SAME-WINDOW, we don't
> need pop-to-buffer-same-window since switch-to-buffer works just as well.

This means we should switch all the pop-to-buffer-same-window calls back
to switch-to-buffer.  Any objections?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: pop-to-buffer-same-window
  2011-09-02 14:26   ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
@ 2011-09-02 14:50     ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-09-02 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong; +Cc: emacs-devel

>> This said, with the new switch-to-buffer's FORCE-SAME-WINDOW, we don't
>> need pop-to-buffer-same-window since switch-to-buffer works just as well.

> This means we should switch all the pop-to-buffer-same-window calls back
> to switch-to-buffer.  Any objections?

No.


        Stefan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-02 14:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-01 16:14 pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
2011-09-01 16:25 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
2011-09-02  2:43 ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier
2011-09-02 14:26   ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Chong Yidong
2011-09-02 14:50     ` pop-to-buffer-same-window Stefan Monnier

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).