unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: allocate_string_data memory corruption
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:14:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Ezkqz-0008VZ-CM@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vewha2zl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:57:02 -0500)

	/* no crash here */
	if (data->string != s || data->nbytes != nbytes) abort ();

	check_sblock (current_sblock);

	/* crash occured here */
	if (data->string != s || data->nbytes != nbytes) abort ();
	...

My first question is, is the value of `data' itself the same
at those two places?  In other words, did the memory locations
pointed to get clobbered, or did the variable `data' itself
get clobbered?

Another question: suppose you replace check_sblock with
a delay loop.  Does it still happen?  Try various values
of the delay.


I just noticed that allocate_string does nothing to prevent
signals from being handled.  Neither does Fcons.  The result
is that if a signal comes inside these lines,

  /* Pop a Lisp_String off the free-list.  */
  s = string_free_list;
  string_free_list = NEXT_FREE_LISP_STRING (s);

then the same string header object could be allocated
both at main program level and in the signal handler.
Or other things could go wrong, depending on precisely
where the signal arrived.

So it seems that these functions need BLOCK_INPUT.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18 16:57 allocate_string_data memory corruption Chong Yidong
2006-01-18 20:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20  0:45   ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-20  1:14   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20  3:48     ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-23 20:21   ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 17:23   ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-18 21:35 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-18 23:56   ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-19  8:53     ` Romain Francoise
2006-01-19 20:57       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-19 22:48         ` Kim F. Storm
2006-01-20  3:46           ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 22:58             ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-25  3:26             ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-25 15:45               ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20  1:14   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20  9:28     ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-20 22:58       ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-18 22:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-18 23:48   ` David Kastrup
2006-01-18 23:48   ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-19  1:15     ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-19  3:21       ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-19  4:36     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-20  1:14 ` Richard M. Stallman [this message]
2006-01-20  3:56   ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 14:49     ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-21 19:57       ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-22 17:37         ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 22:58     ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-21  4:48       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-21 17:31         ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-22  3:57           ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-22 16:45         ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-22 20:06           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-01-23  0:10           ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-23  0:35           ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-23  1:58             ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-23  2:06               ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 16:46             ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-23  0:55         ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 16:46           ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-24 17:57             ` Kim F. Storm
2006-01-24 18:33               ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-25 15:45               ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26  1:41             ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-26 17:46               ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26 18:40                 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-26 19:45                   ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-27 22:32                     ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-27 23:33                       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-29 14:53                         ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-29  4:58                       ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-30  0:57                         ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-30  1:06                           ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-27 22:32                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26 19:10                 ` Chong Yidong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Ezkqz-0008VZ-CM@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).