From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should killing a help or compile buffer also delete the window?
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:22:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1DPoZ3-0005Cw-Iz@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87is2c7mnx.fsf@brockman.se> (message from Daniel Brockman on Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:45:38 +0200)
I realize that you can't expect Emacs to know when you are done with a
window unless you actually tell when. The obvious way to tell when is
to type `C-x 1' or `C-x 0', but this leaves the temporary buffer
lingering, which makes me nervous.
You shouldn't consider these buffers a problem.
I believe the Right Thing to do when the user kills a temporary buffer
whose window was created as a side-effect of displaying the buffer in
question is to restore the old window configuration.
That would definitely be wrong, since you might have changed something
about other windows in the mean time, and those changes should
definitely not be undone.
Finding "the right way" to remove a temporary buffer from the screen
is a very hard problem. Nobody has ever proposed a solution that
really is right all the time, or even nearly all the time. View mode
has tried to implement one, but it too has problems.
I don't want to spend time on thinking about it because I think it
is unlikely to get anywhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-24 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-24 5:45 Should killing a help or compile buffer also delete the window? Daniel Brockman
2005-04-24 11:02 ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-04-24 13:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
2005-04-25 10:32 ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-04-24 21:22 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2005-04-24 22:50 ` Daniel Brockman
2005-04-26 10:04 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-25 17:20 ` Drew Adams
2005-04-25 21:38 ` Daniel Brockman
2005-04-25 17:22 ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-04-25 19:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-25 19:37 ` Daniel Brockman
2005-04-26 20:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-26 14:32 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-25 13:41 David Reitter
2005-04-25 14:11 ` Daniel Brockman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1DPoZ3-0005Cw-Iz@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).