unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problems with debug-on-entry in the Lisp debugger.
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:53:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1D8UqF-0008L2-76@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sm37n2bv.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:05:24 +0100)

       The only solution (within the current implementation) that I can
       think of, is to temporarily remove all debug-on-entry code while
       stepping with `d'.

Would setting inhibit-debug-on-entry temporarily do the job?

       I can think of two points in a macro to set a break for the
       debugger: just before macro expansion and just after it, right
       before the evaluation of the resulting sexp.

The correct place to do it is before macro expansion.
This is a very evident bug, so please just fix it if you can.

						     In both cases, hiding
       the debug-on-entry code from the user of the debugger seems not
       possible.

I am not sure what that means.

    When I was thinking about these three problems, it seemed to me that
    the easiest and simplest thing to do, is to move support for
    debug-on-entry into the C implementation of the Lisp interpreter.  To
    mark a function for debug-on-entry, you could set the debug-on-entry
    property of the function's symbol and the Lisp interpreter would then
    call the debugger.

I agree this is undesirable due to slowness.
I don't see a need for this big a change.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-08  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-07 11:05 Problems with debug-on-entry in the Lisp debugger Lute Kamstra
2005-03-07 13:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-07 15:20   ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-07 16:32     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-08 18:57       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-09 16:58         ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-09 17:30           ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-07 13:40 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-07 14:20   ` drkm
2005-03-07 14:45     ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-08  2:53 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2005-03-08 18:02   ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-08 18:59     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-09 10:14       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-09 16:58     ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-09 16:58     ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-09 17:38       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-03-10  0:26       ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-03-11  1:47         ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1D8UqF-0008L2-76@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).