From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: compilation-highlight-duration
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 13:51:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BJydl-0001N8-26@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040430.222901.226022286.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> (message from Tak Ota on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:29:01 -0700 (PDT))
New compile.el is very nice and I particularly like the highlight
feature. However, the hard coded duration of 0.5 second could be too
short or too long depending on the clock speed of the users' brain.
What exactly is that .5 second delay used for? The code doesn't
have many comments and I am not sure what job it is doing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-01 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-01 5:29 compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-01 17:51 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-05-02 16:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-03 14:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-03 14:13 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 7:43 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 14:54 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 16:55 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 17:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:01 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 21:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:32 ` compilation-highlight-duration Drew Adams
2004-05-04 19:15 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 21:35 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 17:33 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-05 18:05 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 20:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-05 20:59 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 22:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-05-05 21:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-06 5:58 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 9:23 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-06 7:48 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 10:34 ` compilation-highlight-duration David Kastrup
2004-05-06 10:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 1:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-09 18:48 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 19:12 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-10 7:17 ` compilation-highlight-duration Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-10 20:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Daschek
2004-05-28 11:19 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-28 11:42 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-28 15:45 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-28 18:14 ` next-error refactoring Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-29 17:03 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Richard Stallman
2004-06-01 17:55 ` next-error refactoring Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-07 21:27 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-09 19:52 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-03 23:33 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-07 16:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-04 2:03 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-07 16:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-07 17:01 ` Tak Ota
2004-06-08 20:31 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-11 18:39 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-12 9:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-30 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-07-01 5:47 ` Juri Linkov
2004-09-13 18:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-09-14 10:28 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-15 18:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-09 9:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-06-09 20:19 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-10 23:01 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-29 17:02 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1BJydl-0001N8-26@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).