From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Subject: Re: next-error refactoring
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:23:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4n7juo64xv.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E1BVZfV-0006Sm-Ep@fencepost.gnu.org
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, rms@gnu.org wrote:
> Yes, and I think maintenance will be easier if next-error
> functionality is in its own file.
>
> Why do you think it would matter?
It's easier to maintain a file when it has a single purpose.
simple.el gets modified a lot.
It's not a big deal though.
> next-error and related functions are just 150 lines.
> I don't want to split things into new files which are so small.
Understood, disregard my suggestion then.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-03 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-01 5:29 compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-01 17:51 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-02 16:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-03 14:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-03 14:13 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 7:43 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 14:54 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 16:55 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 17:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:01 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 21:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:32 ` compilation-highlight-duration Drew Adams
2004-05-04 19:15 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 21:35 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 17:33 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-05 18:05 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 20:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-05 20:59 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 22:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-05-05 21:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-06 5:58 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 9:23 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-06 7:48 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 10:34 ` compilation-highlight-duration David Kastrup
2004-05-06 10:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 1:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-09 18:48 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 19:12 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-10 7:17 ` compilation-highlight-duration Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-10 20:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Daschek
2004-05-28 11:19 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-28 11:42 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-28 15:45 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-28 18:14 ` next-error refactoring Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-29 17:03 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Richard Stallman
2004-06-01 17:55 ` next-error refactoring Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:23 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2004-06-07 21:27 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-09 19:52 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-03 23:33 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-07 16:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-04 2:03 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-07 16:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-07 17:01 ` Tak Ota
2004-06-08 20:31 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-11 18:39 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-12 9:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-30 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-07-01 5:47 ` Juri Linkov
2004-09-13 18:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-09-14 10:28 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-15 18:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-09 9:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-06-09 20:19 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-10 23:01 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-29 17:02 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4n7juo64xv.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).