From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk, jas@extundo.com
Subject: Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:52:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1AmGKz-0001Fg-IC@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvad49cdu1.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@asado.iro.umontreal.ca> (message from Stefan Monnier on 27 Jan 2004 16:03:21 -0500)
Ian suggested to use -oeq which hands the message to sendmail in the
foreground (with mail-interactive set to t) so sendmail gets a chance to
complain if it has no space in the queue or if there's no queue and no hub,
or if there's no queue and the hub is not accessible.
When mail-interactive is t, Emacs uses -oep. That seems right. The
intention of mail-interactive = t is that you should get to see errors
right away, as much as possible, and this is what does that.
If people find that there is reasonable performance waiting
for sendmail to finish with -oem and -odb for mail-interactive = nil,
we could conceivably try moving further to -oeq in that case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-20 6:14 sendmail.el bug or expected behavior? Rob Browning
2004-01-20 11:53 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-21 9:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-21 18:28 ` Kevin Rodgers
2004-01-21 22:33 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-22 19:00 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-22 19:09 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-23 12:29 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-23 15:13 ` Jan D.
2004-01-26 11:20 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-26 13:28 ` Jan D.
2004-01-26 13:40 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-26 13:50 ` Jan D.
2004-01-26 14:10 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-26 14:25 ` Jan D.
2004-01-26 14:29 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-26 14:35 ` Jan D.
2004-01-26 14:42 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-27 18:49 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-27 21:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-29 17:52 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-01-25 14:46 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-23 18:25 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-23 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-01-23 18:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-26 14:09 ` Ian Jackson
2004-01-26 16:21 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-26 18:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-26 19:26 ` Simon Josefsson
2004-01-26 20:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-27 18:50 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-30 4:27 ` Rob Browning
2004-01-30 14:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-30 14:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-30 14:46 ` David Kastrup
2004-01-30 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-01-31 7:51 ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-31 17:26 ` Rob Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1AmGKz-0001Fg-IC@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
--cc=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=jas@extundo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).