* Re: printing bytecode in backtraces
[not found] ` <rzqn0hgm0b1.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
@ 2003-05-23 12:03 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2003-05-23 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
In fact, `print-escape-nonascii' seems to
make no difference:
It only makes a difference when you output into a unibyte buffer.
That was because nonascii unibyte characters in a multibyte buffer
used to cause trouble.
Now they no longer cause trouble, so perhaps we should change that so
that print-escape-nonascii really controls the decision for all kinds
of buffers. That would make things cleaner, but might break something.
What do people think?
For the moment, I will document this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-05-23 12:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <rzq4r3usvof.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <rzqn0hgm0b1.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
2003-05-23 12:03 ` printing bytecode in backtraces Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).