iconify-or-deiconify-frame

iconify-or-deiconify-frame

[Stefan Monnier]

iconify-or-deiconify-frame is defined in x-win.el and in the equivalent
file for w32 as well as Mac.
Any objection to moving it to frame.el ?


	Stefan

Re: iconify-or-deiconify-frame

[Richard Stallman]

    iconify-or-deiconify-frame is defined in x-win.el and in the equivalent
    file for w32 as well as Mac.
    Any objection to moving it to frame.el ?

The main difference this will make is that it will be defined
when you're on a tty.  I don't see any harm in that.

Re: iconify-or-deiconify-frame

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:40:56 -0400
> 
>     iconify-or-deiconify-frame is defined in x-win.el and in the equivalent
>     file for w32 as well as Mac.
>     Any objection to moving it to frame.el ?
> 
> The main difference this will make is that it will be defined
> when you're on a tty.  I don't see any harm in that.

Unless some Lisp code tests for it to be fboundp, and assumes it isn't
on a tty.  If it is bound, that code could then invoke some other
functions that on a tty would throw errors.  So perhaps grep the *.el
files for such tests first.

Re: iconify-or-deiconify-frame

[Richard Stallman]

    Unless some Lisp code tests for it to be fboundp, and assumes it isn't
    on a tty.  If it is bound, that code could then invoke some other
    functions that on a tty would throw errors.  So perhaps grep the *.el
    files for such tests first.

That is a good idea.  I just did the grep and there is no such
problem.  Thanks.