From: Edward Welbourne <eddy@opera.no>
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, abraham@dina.kvl.dk,
y@mit.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: customize, futility of byte-compiling
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:00:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17eA8B-0003n3-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208101230.g7ACUI816729@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
> Since it has no benefit whatsoever,
this is the bit that needs explained.
Why does byte-compilation gain no benefit ?
Is this specific to customizations, or generally true ?
Eddy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-12 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E17SKgH-00005W-00@whorl.intern.opera.no>
[not found] ` <200207111201.g6BC1OM16938@aztec.santafe.edu>
[not found] ` <E17SgpB-0003rO-00@whorl.intern.opera.no>
2002-07-14 15:22 ` customize Richard Stallman
2002-07-15 9:18 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-15 14:08 ` customize Stefan Monnier
2002-07-15 15:36 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-16 13:28 ` customize Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <15680.26449.937153.817907@localhost.localdomain>
2002-07-27 18:53 ` customize Richard Stallman
2002-07-29 11:17 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-29 12:49 ` customize Kai Großjohann
2002-07-29 13:50 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-29 15:22 ` customize chad
2002-08-05 17:47 ` customize Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-06 16:53 ` customize chad
2002-08-09 6:52 ` customize Stefan Monnier
2002-08-09 8:32 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-08-10 12:30 ` customize Stefan Monnier
2002-08-12 8:00 ` Edward Welbourne [this message]
2002-08-12 10:01 ` customize, futility of byte-compiling Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-12 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16 ` customize Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 16:28 ` customize Stefan Monnier
2002-08-14 5:15 ` customize Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 21:51 ` customize Stefan Monnier
2002-07-29 16:15 ` customize Per Abrahamsen
2002-07-29 18:15 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-29 19:42 ` customize Kai Großjohann
2002-07-30 8:32 ` customize Edward Welbourne
2002-07-30 11:32 ` customize Robert J. Chassell
2002-07-30 5:16 ` customize Eli Zaretskii
2002-07-30 5:14 ` customize Eli Zaretskii
2002-07-30 1:00 ` customize Richard Stallman
2002-08-03 0:46 ` customize Jeff Dwork
2002-08-09 7:33 ` customize Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17eA8B-0003n3-00@whorl.intern.opera.no \
--to=eddy@opera.no \
--cc=abraham@dina.kvl.dk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=y@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).