From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Edward Welbourne <eddy@opera.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: customize, futility of byte-compiling
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:00:51 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17eA8B-0003n3-00@whorl.intern.opera.no>
References: <E17SKgH-00005W-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> <200207111201.g6BC1OM16938@aztec.santafe.edu> <E17SgpB-0003rO-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> <15680.26449.937153.817907@localhost.localdomain> <200207271853.g6RIrdt10834@aztec.santafe.edu> <E17Z8WY-0008Tw-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> <vafbs8q8zsb.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <E17ZAuW-0002KT-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> <200207291522.g6TFMLj26086@localhost.localdomain> <rjelddkxir.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk> <200208090652.g796qvr11416@rum.cs.yale.edu>  <E17d5CD-00034E-00@whorl.intern.opera.no> <200208101230.g7ACUI816729@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: eddy@opera.no
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029139340 16146 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2002 08:02:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, abraham@dina.kvl.dk, y@mit.edu,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eA9b-0004CJ-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:02:19 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eAXX-0006ZN-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:27:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eA9w-0003l9-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:02:40 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eA8o-0003jN-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:01:30 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eA8n-0003jB-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:01:29 -0400
Original-Received: from pat.opera.com ([193.69.113.22] helo=whorl.intern.opera.no)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17eA8m-0003j6-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:01:28 -0400
Original-Received: from eddy by whorl.intern.opera.no with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17eA8B-0003n3-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:00:51 +0200
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-Reply-To: <200208101230.g7ACUI816729@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6454
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6454

> Since it has no benefit whatsoever,
this is the bit that needs explained.
Why does byte-compilation gain no benefit ?
Is this specific to customizations, or generally true ?

	Eddy.