[d.love@dl.ac.uk: bad translations in quail latin-3-prefix]

[d.love@dl.ac.uk: bad translations in quail latin-3-prefix]

[Richard Stallman]

Can anyone comment on this change?  Is it correct?
(Does anyone on this list use Latin-3?)

------- Start of forwarded message -------
To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: bad translations in quail latin-3-prefix
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Date: 24 Jun 2002 22:12:51 +0100

- --BROMURE-COSCO-Kh-11-AGT.-AMME-ASO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Some of the sequences translate to invalid Latin-3 code points, and
~o->=F5 doesn't make sense.  I can't tell whether there was some more
valid intent here.


- --BROMURE-COSCO-Kh-11-AGT.-AMME-ASO
Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-3
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2002-06-20  Dave Love  <fx@gnu.org>

	* quail/latin-pre.el ("latin-3-prefix"): Remove bogus Latin-3
	characters and ~o -> =F5, ~O -> =D5.

*** latin-pre.el.~1.14.~	Mon Jul 16 21:22:24 2001
- --- latin-pre.el	Thu Jun 20 21:19:32 2002
***************
*** 652,668 ****
   ("\"s" ?=DF)
   ("\"\"" ?=A8)
   ("\" " ?\")
- -  ("~A" ?=C3)
   ("~C" ?=C7)
- -  ("~D" ?=D0)
   ("~N" ?=D1)
- -  ("~O" ?=D5)
- -  ("~a" ?=E3)
   ("~c" ?=E7)
- -  ("~d" ?=F0)
   ("~n" ?=F1)
- -  ("~o" ?=F5)
- -  ("~$" ?=A5)
   ("~S" ?=AA)
   ("~s" ?=BA)
   ("~G" ?=AB)
- --- 652,661 ----
***************
*** 682,688 ****
   ("/h" ?=B1)
   ("/i" ?=B9)
   ("/z" ?=BF)
- -  ("/r" ?=AE)
   ("/." ?=FF)
   ("/#" ?=A3)
   ("/$" ?=A4)
- --- 675,680 ----

- --BROMURE-COSCO-Kh-11-AGT.-AMME-ASO--

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs
------- End of forwarded message -------