From: Duncan Findlay <duncf@google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Set X primary selection with Emacs in xterm
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:03:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPANw+P2RaWWVbhSHHY1+c1R4+GEKMcu19XM9DWenr_oXTBvqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83ilp8z4tx.fsf@gnu.org>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:38 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Duncan Findlay <duncf@google.com>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:10:50 -0700
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 11:56 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. I think we should solve this differently. I don't think it's
> > > a good idea to call arbitrary Lisp from input-processing loop in
> > > keyboard.c, anymore than we already do (which is already too much,
> > > IMNSHO), especially if we envision advices for that code.
> > >
> > > We should instead modify the condition in command_loop_1 to support
> > > terminals that can set GUI selections. terminal-parameter is a
> > > primitive written in C, so command_loop_1 could call it directly (it
> > > should also pay attention to the defcustom described below).
> >
> > I considered this, but given that we're making the same decision in
> > lisp/simple.el (deactivate-mark) using display-selections-p, the
> > benefits of sharing an implementation seemed compelling.
>
> That's not what bothers me, as I explain above. I don't want us to
> call more Lisp from the loop that processes keyboard input, if that
> can be avoided. And in this case, it can be easily avoided.
>
> > I see your point about wanting to minimize lisp in the command loop.
> > Can we just port display-selections-p to C and use it from both
> > places, or will that break things?
>
> I see no need for doing that. display-selections-p is okay in Lisp,
> as it is called from Lisp programs.
Got it -- thanks. This ended up being not nearly as difficult as I'd feared.
> > > > + ((and (memq frame-type '(t))
> > > > + (eq (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--set-selection) t))
> > > > + t)
> > >
> > > This is unnecessarily strict: there should be no need to test
> > > frame-type, since any frame type could arrange for this parameter when
> > > it supports selections.
> >
> > In practice, are there other frame types? Is it reasonable to set
> > terminal-parameter for other frame types?
>
> Maybe not today, but I'd like this code to be more future-proof.
> There's no need to test for more things that are absolutely necessary,
> and testing for the xterm--set-selection parameter is enough in this
> case, isn't it?
I've sent a new version that addresses this, too.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/55883
Thanks for bearing with me on this.
Duncan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-11 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-03 4:03 Set X primary selection with Emacs in xterm Duncan Findlay
2022-06-03 5:33 ` Po Lu
2022-06-03 12:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-06-10 6:36 ` Duncan Findlay
2022-06-03 6:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-10 18:10 ` Duncan Findlay
2022-06-10 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-11 2:03 ` Duncan Findlay [this message]
2022-06-03 9:55 ` Jean Louis
2022-06-10 5:49 ` Duncan Findlay
2022-06-10 8:50 ` James Cloos
2022-06-11 6:56 ` Jean Louis
2022-06-15 2:43 ` Duncan Findlay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPANw+P2RaWWVbhSHHY1+c1R4+GEKMcu19XM9DWenr_oXTBvqw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=duncf@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).