From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Susam Pal <susam.pal@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 14:30:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALDnm52pAEoaD26DaTGUMUMZd37u3M_i2v1aW=hkJBdt-Xbm+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-5M90p-tHwa1sBGWvLTGTU6wY351fVWy300kcFd4QHoYp+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3506 bytes --]
On Sat, May 13, 2023, 10:06 Susam Pal <susam.pal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> wrote:
> >
> > Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > On 5/10/2023 11:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >> Please reconsider, I think this name is very unfortunate, because it
> > >> gives users no clue whatsoever about the package's purpose.
> > >
> > > How about something like "devil-keys"? That should make it clear that
> > > the package has something to do with keys. It doesn't tell exactly
> > > what it *does* with those keys, but I think a more-detailed
> > > description belongs in the package description or the manual.
> > >
> > > Within the package itself, I think it would be fine to refer to it as
> > > "Devil" (without the "-keys"), since once you're looking at the
> > > package in detail, the "keys" hint isn't needed anymore.
> >
> > I think this is a nice idea, and a good compromise.
>
> I worry that choosing "devil-keys" as the package identifier is going
> to make the identifier inconsistent with how Devil is packaged in
> MELPA. The instructions to install Devil are going to become more
> complicated than they need to be with differing instructions for MELPA
> and NonGNU ELPA.
>
> I am not convinced that a meaningful name is necessary for this
> package. Consider the popular package meow. It is a fairly recent
> package that was created in 2020 and added in December 2022. It exists
> with the name "meow" in NonGNU ELPA. People who do not know about it
> of course do not know about it. But people who do know about it do not
> get confused about what it does. I doubt anyone is going to stumble
> upon these packages merely due to a meaningful name. At minimum, one
> is going to run M-x package-list-packages RET and search the buffer
> for strings like "modal", "key", etc. But more typically, people
> encounter these packages via recommendations from other community
> members. People learn about packages like this in some context where
> the context makes it clear what these packages do.
>
> In general, I do not think packages with quirky names or names
> unrelated to the purpose of the package is a problem. On the other
> hand, I feel, the more the merrier! At the same time, I do acknowledge
> that opinions on this matter differ.
>
> Devil is a package created as a result of a whimsical idea and I think
> the whimsical name is befitting. In my humble opinion, an additional
> suffix like "-keys" does not really add much. One still has to read
> the package description to understand what it does. However adding
> this suffix does take away something. It takes away simplicity,
> elegance, and consistency. It introduces inconsistency between the
> package identifier and the package name. It introduces inconsistency
> between NonGNU ELPA and MELPA.
>
> I believe that using "devil" as both the package identifier and name,
> combined with the updated package description mentioning its purpose
> as a key sequence translation package does provide sufficient clarity
> for anyone browsing the package list.
>
> I would like to thank everyone who has generously invested their time
> and contributed to this discussion. Despite differing opinions, I
> wanted to take a moment to express my thoughts on the matter.
>
FWIW i agree with you on all points.
It's important for packages to be allowed to keep the names the developers
baptized them with.
João
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4567 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 5:23 [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil Payas Relekar
2023-05-11 6:26 ` Po Lu
2023-05-11 6:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 6:52 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-11 7:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-12 15:02 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-11 8:09 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 8:45 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-11 8:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 9:08 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 9:12 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-11 9:19 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 9:34 ` Ruijie Yu via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-11 10:09 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 10:31 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-11 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-11 8:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-12 16:19 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-13 7:10 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-13 9:05 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-15 22:12 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-17 13:30 ` João Távora [this message]
2023-05-17 14:06 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-17 15:41 ` João Távora
2023-05-17 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-13 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-14 4:29 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil) Jim Porter
2023-05-14 7:47 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-14 19:23 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-14 19:33 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-19 3:49 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-19 4:33 ` Akib Azmain Turja
2023-05-20 16:51 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-21 21:03 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-14 21:36 ` Stefan Monnier via Emacs development discussions.
2023-05-14 22:17 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-14 23:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-05-15 1:36 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-15 22:15 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil) Richard Stallman
2023-05-15 22:15 ` Richard Stallman
2023-05-16 4:51 ` Jim Porter
2023-05-16 8:42 ` Naming guidelines for ELPA packages Madhu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-09 1:57 [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil Susam Pal
2023-05-09 8:42 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-09 8:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-09 8:58 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-09 18:19 ` chad
2023-05-09 22:07 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-09 20:56 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-10 6:09 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-05-10 21:00 ` Susam Pal
2023-05-10 21:56 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALDnm52pAEoaD26DaTGUMUMZd37u3M_i2v1aW=hkJBdt-Xbm+g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=susam.pal@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).