Re: New defun navigation for tree-sitter (Was: Code navigation for sh-mode with Tree-sitter)

["João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho" <jaopaulolc@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1005 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 9:38 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> I think the command that goes to the firs leaf backwards should be
> bound to C-M-u, not C-M-a.


I think C-M-u is doing what I would expect, although it is currently moving
point to "{" instead of the beginning of the function definition (in .

But I like the idea of using C-M-u/C-M-d to move outwards and inwards. And
maybe we can use C-M-a/C-M-e for horizontal tree movements across sibling
functions, or upwards when the current level does not have sibling
functions.


> Or maybe we should have an entirely new key binding for these
> fine-tuned movements.
>

That might be needed as C-M-u/C-M-d moves across a class of "list-defining"
characters (e.g. "{" , "(", and "[").


-- 
João Paulo L. de Carvalho
Ph.D Computer Science |  IC-UNICAMP | Campinas , SP - Brazil
Postdoctoral Research Fellow | University of Alberta | Edmonton, AB - Canada
joao.carvalho@ic.unicamp.br
joao.carvalho@ualberta.ca

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1809 bytes --]