From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Everyone, please stop making my life more difficult
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:59:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4tovngh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2k358g8v9.fsf@gnu.org
Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org> writes:
>> * Yuri Khan <lhev.i.xuna@tznvy.pbz> [2014-09-12 21:44:24 +0700]:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:36 PM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> If the commit timestamp were anything but "tomorrow" it would be a bug.
>>> The whole point of a commit timestamp is to track who created a commit
>>> when. Since a rebase creates commits, obviously the commit timestamp
>>> will correspond to the time of the rebase, and the commit author will
>>> correspond to the person doing the rebase.
>>>
>>> Which is exactly why using "commit author/timestamp" is not going to cut
>>> it as a unique identifier when rebases come into play.
>>
>> Neither does author/timestamp uniquely identify a commit in a
>> rebaseful commit graph. But at least the commits having the same
>> author/timestamp all conceptually represent the same change.
>
> Not at all - if we accept the notion that rebase changes timestamp.
> E.g., if I work for a week making 20 separate unrelated commits on
> different days and then rebase, then all the 20 commits will have the
> same timestamp.
Git has different timestamps for author and committer. Rebasing does
not change author timestamp and identity.
--
David Kastrup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-12 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 4:36 Everyone, please stop making my life more difficult Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 6:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 9:55 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 10:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 10:49 ` Gregor Zattler
2014-09-12 13:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 13:19 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 13:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 13:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 15:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 15:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 17:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 15:53 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 17:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 19:28 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 19:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 13:57 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 14:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 11:38 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 13:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 16:27 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 11:46 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2014-09-12 13:56 ` Paul Eggert
2014-09-12 15:08 ` Barry Warsaw
2014-09-12 16:16 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 6:47 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2014-09-12 7:25 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 9:34 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2014-09-12 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-12 8:34 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 8:40 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 11:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 11:57 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 12:17 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 13:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 15:54 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 16:04 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 16:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 16:28 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 16:43 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 20:19 ` resolving ambiguity in action stamps (was: Everyone, please stop making my life more difficult) Joshua Judson Rosen
2014-09-12 20:41 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 21:44 ` resolving ambiguity in action stamps Joshua Judson Rosen
2014-09-13 3:45 ` resolving ambiguity in action stamps (was: Everyone, please stop making my life more difficult) Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-13 5:35 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-13 6:57 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-13 7:26 ` resolving ambiguity in action stamps Harald Hanche-Olsen
2014-09-13 10:50 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-13 12:43 ` Yuri Khan
2014-09-14 7:34 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-14 10:55 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-14 11:03 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-14 13:30 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-14 14:06 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-14 15:51 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-14 14:21 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-14 15:45 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-14 15:59 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-14 17:12 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-15 0:09 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-13 8:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-09-12 14:12 ` Everyone, please stop making my life more difficult Sam Steingold
2014-09-12 14:36 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 14:44 ` Yuri Khan
2014-09-12 15:24 ` Sam Steingold
2014-09-12 15:59 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2014-09-12 16:12 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-09-12 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-09-12 20:35 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2014-09-12 15:21 ` Sam Steingold
2014-09-12 15:34 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2014-09-12 15:51 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 17:44 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-12 17:58 ` David Caldwell
2014-09-12 19:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-09-12 18:01 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2014-09-12 19:36 ` Joshua Judson Rosen
2014-10-28 21:11 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2014-09-12 15:30 ` Phillip Lord
2014-09-12 15:57 ` David Kastrup
2014-09-12 17:10 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4tovngh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).