unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cleanups and tests for DEFVAR_PER_BUFFER variables
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 16:53:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1jrw0mh.fsf@catern.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83sg49g7n6.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> Thanks, that's encouraging.  But we need a few more benchmarks, I
> think.  One of them should be for redisplay, as it's a
> performance-critical part of Emacs, and it accesses buffer-local
> variables quite a lot.  So something like a benchmark of scrolling
> through xdisp.c one line at a time in an interactive session would
> probably give us an idea.

OK, I did that.  Specifically I ran:

(defun xdisp-bench ()
  (let ((gc-cons-threshold 8000000000))
    (print (number-to-string (car
      (benchmark-run 3 (with-temp-buffer 
        (switch-to-buffer (current-buffer))
        (let* ((height (window-total-height))
               (lines (+ 10 height)))
          (dotimes (i (* 2 height)) (insert "\nhello" (number-to-string i)))
          (dotimes (_ 5)
            (dotimes (_ lines) (scroll-down 1) (redisplay))
            (dotimes (_ lines) (scroll-up 1) (redisplay))))))
    )) #'external-debugging-output)
    (kill-emacs)))

My results (from running emacs -f xdisp-bench 10 times and discarding
the first 2 results, on X11 with GTK):

| Unmodified Emacs                                    | 6.529 |
| My changes                                          | 6.610 |
| My changes + no default for bidi_display_reordering | 6.582 |

About a 1-2% slowdown from my changes.

I tried removing the default for bidi_display_reordering; customizing
bidi-display-reording is explicitly unsupported anyway, so I think
changing its behavior is reasonable.

That improved performance but unfortunately not enough to fully match an
unmodified Emacs.  Not sure what else to do.

I could remove the defaults for more variables that are heavily used
in xdisp.c, but I guess that will be fairly difficult for most of
them.

Thoughts?

> Another benchmark we frequently use is to remove all *.elc files and
> then time "make" which byte-compiles them all.

I did this, seems fine:

| Unmodified Emacs | 38m2.042s  |
| With my changes  | 37m48.127s |



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-03 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24  3:11 [PATCH 0/7] Cleanups and tests for DEFVAR_PER_BUFFER variables Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] Add a test for let-binding unwinding Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] Assert not local-variable-p after setq in let_default binding Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] Stop checking the constant default for enable_multibyte_characters Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] Take buffer field name in DEFVAR_PER_BUFFER Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] Combine unnecessarily separate loops in buffer.c Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] Assert that PER_BUFFER_IDX for Lisp variables is not 0 Spencer Baugh
2021-03-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] Remove unnecessary Qunbound check Spencer Baugh
2021-03-25 16:46   ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-24  5:36 ` [PATCH 0/7] Cleanups and tests for DEFVAR_PER_BUFFER variables Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-25 16:48   ` Stefan Monnier
2021-03-25 17:00     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-01 18:13   ` Spencer Baugh
2021-04-01 18:51     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-03 20:53       ` Spencer Baugh [this message]
2021-04-04  7:15         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-01 21:42     ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-01 23:39       ` Spencer Baugh
2021-04-02  2:55         ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-02  5:36       ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r1jrw0mh.fsf@catern.com \
    --to=sbaugh@catern.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).