unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
To: Robin Tarsiger <rtt@dasyatidae.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8hvd4q5.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> (Robin Tarsiger's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:47:11 -0600")

Robin Tarsiger <rtt@dasyatidae.com> writes:

> In the meantime, if others on the list would be willing to test these
> on Windows and/or with unusual resolver configurations, especially
> if you can get or point to a packet dump of how a Windows system
> converts different getaddrinfo parameters to DNS requests on the
> wire (and the responses, if comfortable with that), that would also
> be useful. In particular, if this turns out to be specific to
> Windows but not specific to that one host's network, then it may
> make sense to set some flags conditioned on OS. I am also curious
> whether AI_ALL _without_ AI_V4MAPPED does anything on Windows, per
> what I mentioned upthread.
>

Iʼve only been tangentially following this discussion, but my first
reaction is that V4 mapped V6 addresses are best avoided. Either go
for proper IPv6 connectivity or avoid IPv6 entirely..

> -RTT "Why is wanting things to be correct so messy sometimes"

Such is life (and not just with technology).

Robert



  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-31 15:06 ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo Eli Zaretskii
2020-12-31 22:40 ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-01  7:43   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-01 11:40     ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-01 12:04       ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-01 12:48       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02  0:19         ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-03 16:00   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 10:47     ` ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-11 12:42       ` Robert Pluim [this message]
2021-01-11 15:25       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 15:47         ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 16:44           ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 17:07             ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-11 17:53               ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 18:30                 ` Robin Tarsiger
2021-01-11 18:42                   ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 19:28                     ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-11 20:12                       ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 20:41                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 20:55                           ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-11 21:02                           ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 21:09                             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-11 21:15                               ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 22:42                                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-12  9:40                                   ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 12:49                                     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-12 13:04                                       ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 14:08                                         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-12 14:29                                           ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 18:06                                             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-12 15:14                                       ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-12 15:45                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-12  3:29                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 20:46                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-11 20:56                   ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 15:01                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-12 15:36                       ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 15:42                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-12 16:00                         ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 16:05                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-12 17:56                             ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 19:32           ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2021-01-11 20:19             ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-11 23:57           ` Andy Moreton
2021-01-12  9:44             ` Robert Pluim
2021-01-12 11:56               ` tomas
2021-01-01 10:59 ` ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-01 12:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02  5:40     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8hvd4q5.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=rpluim@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rtt@dasyatidae.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).