Re: Adding Flycheck to NonGNU ELPA

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> writes:

> On 21/02/2024 19:01, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>  writes:
>> 
>>> On 20/02/2024 22:04, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/2024 13:48, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If Flycheck were to use the same interface as Flymake, then the
>>>>> situation would be better, as it would only be a different UI with
>>>>> perhaps some other priorities.
>>>> Flycheck uses macros to define checkers and output parsers. Perhaps
>>>> one day those could expand to Flymake's functional interface under
>>>> the covers, but for that to happen, it would help a lot if we were
>>>> more welcoming.
>>> So, unless unless there is a strong objection from one of Emacs's head
>>> maintainers, I think I will commence Flycheck's addition to NonGNU in
>>> the next few days.
>> Before taking this step, can we please discuss the possibility of
>> creating a uniform interface?  As mentioned in my previous message,
>> this
>> is the crux of my complaint, and I don't even know what Bozhidar
>> position on the matter is.
>
> We've discussed it. Such possibility exists.

Who is we?

> If we're going to make the implementation of it as a prerequisite for
> merging, however, I imagine that's just not going to
> happen. Flycheck's contributors will go back to their own bubble, and
> we'll stay in ours.

As you might guess, I don't consider this a problem.

> Those are my expectations both from experience, and from the current
> mood of the people involved.

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> Before taking this step, can we please discuss the possibility of
>> creating a uniform interface?
>
> That's orthogonal.

Not if the Flycheck maintainers have no interest, or are even opposed to
it.