unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:43:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2xvpnc5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kbh947$p0i$1@ger.gmane.org>

Achim Gratz writes:

 > All languages I know that have a syntactic "break" use it to modify 
 > local control flow.

Point taken.  This is really more like a throw (but I don't trust my
intuition enough to suggest anything right now :-P )..

 > Unless I missed some vital part of the discussion, we'd want to
 > terminate an async process that has used up the time budget alotted
 > to it.

No, it's because Emacs is blocking that this timeout mechanism has
been suggested.  If the task were asynchronous there wouldn't be a
need for a separate timeout.  We would just sleep a bit and check a
buffer from Lisp code, and repeat a fixed number of times or until
success, whichever comes first.  It could used for any potentially
long-running synchronous task, whether I/O or a user-specified
Lisp computation.




  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-27 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-25 13:20 Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-12-25 13:52 ` Xue Fuqiao
2012-12-25 19:57 ` Karl Fogel
2012-12-26 14:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-12-27  4:08   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2012-12-27 10:49     ` Achim Gratz
2012-12-27 14:43       ` Stephen J. Turnbull [this message]
2012-12-27  9:40 ` Vitalie Spinu
2012-12-27 14:01   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-12-29  6:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-12-31 14:09   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2013-01-03 16:47     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-03 23:34       ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2013-01-04  1:56         ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2xvpnc5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    --to=stephen@xemacs.org \
    --cc=Stromeko@Nexgo.DE \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).