From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:20:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vi9gqst.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83iphdb6dp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:40:18 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
>> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:29:13 +0200
>>
>> Regular Org testers don't want to rebuild Emacs each time they have
>> to test a new feature in Org.
>
> Why would they need to do that? Org is not preloaded into Emacs, so
> all you need is compile the new Org files and perhaps restart the
> Emacs session, but not rebuild Emacs.
Right. But there are other problems.
- Updating to the latest Org via `bzr update' would take longer compared
to the current `git pull' (several factors here...)
- Some people don't have access to their Emacs installation (at work,
for example) and still want the latest Org.
And surely more. In any case, I'm all in favor of having the most
recent Org in Emacs trunk regularily, but migrating the development
of Org from the separate git repo to Emacs bzr repo is a no-go.
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 13:28 Next pretest, and regressions policy Chong Yidong
2012-03-31 10:15 ` Bastien
2012-04-01 9:55 ` Bastien
2012-04-01 12:37 ` =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?=
2012-04-01 13:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-01 17:09 ` Chong Yidong
2012-04-01 20:32 ` Bastien
2012-04-02 4:12 ` Chong Yidong
2012-04-01 20:32 ` Bastien
2012-04-03 8:20 ` patch vs. overwrite in bzr [was: Next pretest, and regressions policy] Roland Winkler
2012-04-03 12:36 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-03 13:42 ` Bastien
2012-04-03 15:02 ` patch vs. overwrite in bzr =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?=
2012-04-03 15:03 ` David Engster
2012-04-03 16:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-03 17:40 ` Michael Albinus
2012-04-03 15:32 ` patch vs. overwrite in bzr [was: Next pretest, and regressions policy] Stefan Monnier
2012-04-03 16:52 ` patch vs. overwrite in bzr Glenn Morris
2012-04-03 20:50 ` Bastien
2012-04-03 21:27 ` Glenn Morris
2012-04-04 0:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-04 5:45 ` Bastien
2012-04-04 5:51 ` Bastien
2012-04-04 6:46 ` Michael Albinus
2012-04-04 8:35 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2012-04-04 13:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-04 16:39 ` Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
2012-04-04 16:52 ` Paul Eggert
2012-04-04 17:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 17:53 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2012-04-04 19:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 19:38 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2012-04-04 20:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 13:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-04 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 18:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-04 19:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 20:11 ` David Engster
2012-04-04 22:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-05 3:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-05 13:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-04-05 15:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2012-04-05 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-05 17:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-04-06 7:13 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-06 8:29 ` Bastien
2012-04-06 8:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-06 9:20 ` Bastien [this message]
2012-04-06 9:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-06 10:20 ` Bastien
2012-04-06 17:26 ` chad
2012-04-06 20:01 ` joakim
2012-04-06 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-07 2:28 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-07 6:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-07 11:56 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-07 12:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-07 12:56 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-07 13:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-07 13:42 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-07 7:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-07 11:44 ` Óscar Fuentes
2012-04-06 21:10 ` Juanma Barranquero
2012-04-16 10:45 ` Jason Rumney
2012-04-16 16:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-06 16:17 ` Christophe Poncy
2012-04-06 16:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-06 17:14 ` Christophe Poncy
2012-04-07 0:17 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-07 0:17 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-07 9:15 ` Bastien
2012-04-07 22:19 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-09 9:39 ` Bastien
2012-04-08 3:25 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-08 15:52 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-04-16 22:02 ` Richard Stallman
2012-04-06 8:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-04 17:12 ` patch vs. overwrite in bzr [was: Next pretest, and regressions policy] Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-05 7:13 ` Bastien
2012-04-05 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-04-11 14:36 ` Bastien
2012-04-04 18:01 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2012-04-05 7:19 ` Bastien
2012-04-05 9:16 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2012-04-01 20:35 ` Next pretest, and regressions policy Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vi9gqst.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).